Cited by 278Sleep and related disordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) to treat depression: a systematic review

Cunningham, Jasmyn E.A., Shapiro, Colin M.·2018·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Introduction Major depressive disorder is one of the most commonly diagnosed psychiatric illnesses, and it has a profound negative impact on an individual's ability to function. Up to 90% of individuals suffering from depression also report sleep and circadian disruptions. If these disruptions are not effectively resolved over the course of treatment, the likelihood of relapse into depression is greatly increased. Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) has shown promise in treating these sleep and circadian disturbances associated with depression, and may be effective as a stand-alone treatment for depression. This may be particularly relevant in cases where antidepressant medications are not ideal (e.g. due to contraindications, cost, or treatment resistance).Methods A systematic literature review was conducted of trials investigating the use of CBT-I to treat depression in adults. Therapy included in-person CBT-I, as well as telehealth and group CBT-I.Results and conclusions CBT-I presents a promising treatment for depression comorbid with insomnia. In-person therapy has the most supporting evidence for its efficacy, though treatment effects may not be additive with those of antidepressant medications. Insomnia improvement due to CBT-I may mediate the improvement in depressive symptoms. There is less evidence for the use of telehealth, though a stepped-care approach is indicated based on baseline depressive severity. More research on group therapy and telehealth modalities of delivering CBT-I are required before making recommendations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.12.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 278

Authors
Cunningham, J. E. A., & Shapiro, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Cunningham, Jasmyn E.A.
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
106
Pages
1-12
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2780876400
Cited by
278
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Youthdale Foundation Sleep Program (017ST)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, depression, insomnia, circadian rhythm disruption, sleep disorders, comorbid insomnia, antidepressant resistance, telemedicine, group therapy, stepped care, relapse prevention
MeSH terms
Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review