The worldwide prevalence of self-reported psychological and behavioral symptoms in medical students: An umbrella review and meta-analysis of meta-analyses
Abstract
Objective Medical students frequently experience a range of stressors, such as demanding academic requirements, competition and rivalry, self-doubt, and financial distress. As a result, they are at risk for psychological and behavioral symptoms (PBS) including: depression, anxiety, and sleep difficulties as well as maladaptive substance use.Methods To determine the degree of risk for these symptoms, 13 databases, without language restriction., were searched.Results A total of 32 meta-analyses were included in this umbrella review. A global analysis of all self-reported PBS combined yielded a pooled prevalence rate of 30.3% [26.9%; 33.7%]; 95% PI [2.2%; 58.3%]. The highest reported prevalence was for sleep problems 42.0% [35.6%; 48.4%], followed by stress 41.7% [35.3%; 48.1%], burnout 35.8% [25.7%; 45.8%], anxiety 32.5% [27.9%; 37.1%], depression 32.5% [28.8%; 36.1%], internet addiction 26.0% [5.5%; 46.5%], substance use 25.2% [18.9%; 31.6%], eating disorders 9.8% [1.1%; 18.4%], and suicidal thoughts/gestures/acts 8.9% [4.8%; 12.9%]. The prevalence estimates were deemed acceptable for all PBS.Conclusion The evidence shows that fully one-third of medical students experience a range of problematic PBS, likely attributable to the demanding and intense study environment, the hierarchical structure of medical training facilities, and the vulnerability of the young adulthood time period. Appropriately targeted assessment and intervention efforts are clearly warranted to decrease the psychological burden of medical student training. PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42023391800. Open Science Network (OSF) Identifier: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/SXQYN.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These findings provide important new evidence for a viable strategy to counter the growing mental health crisis facing such students.
“These findings provide important new evidence for a viable strategy to counter the growing mental health crisis facing such students [1].”
From Enhanced Stress-Resilience Training (ESRT) for graduate-entry medical students: a randomised-controlled, mixed-method investigation (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 72
- Authors
- Jahrami, H., AlKaabi, J., Trabelsi, K., Pandi-Perumal, S. R., Saif, Z., Seeman, M. V., & Vitiello, M. V.
- Affiliations
- Government Hospitals (BH)
- Arabian Gulf University (BH)
- University of Sfax (TN)
- Lovely Professional University (IN)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jahrami, Haitham
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Psychosomatic Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-10
- Volume
- 173
- Pages
- 111479
- ISSN
- 0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4386187708
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 3.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- medical students, psychological symptoms, behavioral symptoms, prevalence, depression, anxiety, sleep disorders, burnout, stress, internet addiction, substance use, eating disorders, suicidal ideation, medical education, student mental health
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anxiety, Burnout, Professional, Depression, Humans, Students, Medical, Prevalence, Young Adult, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review