CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 116School Choice and PerformanceEducational Environments and Student OutcomesPolitics, Economics, and Education Policy

Investing in schools: capital spending, facility conditions, and student achievement

Martorell, Paco, Stange, Kevin, McFarlin, Isaac·2016·Journal of Public Economics
DOI 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.05.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.05.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 116

Authors
Martorell, P., Stange, K., & McFarlin, I.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Stange, Kevin
ORCID
Stange, Kevin
Venue
Journal of Public Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
140
Pages
13-29
ISSN
0047-2727 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.05.002
OpenAlex
W1856328143
Cited by
116
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2
FWCI
44.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Public Economics (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Education (R305A140363)
  • Upjohn Institute
  • WT Grant Foundation (183564)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Politics, Economics, and Education Policy
Keywords
academic performance, local school districts, school modernization, school construction, achievement gap, public investment in education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review