Cited by 108Higher Education Research StudiesSchool Choice and PerformanceIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

Financial aid, debt management, and socioeconomic outcomes: Post-college effects of merit-based aid

Open access
Scott-Clayton, Judith, Zafar, Basit·2019·Journal of Public Economics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.01.006

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Scott-Clayton and Zafar (2019) find that longer-term effects of PROMISE scholarship eligibility included increased graduate school enrollment, homeownership, and likelihood of living in a higher-income neighborhood.

    “Longer-term effects of eligibility included increased graduate school enrollment, homeownership and likelihood of living in a higher-income neighborhood (Scott-Clayton & Zafar, 2019).”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Scott-Clayton & Zafar, 2019

  • Stringent credit-completion thresholds in WV's PROMISE scholarship contributed to its impacts on on-time completion and post-college outcomes.

    “stringent credit-completion thresholds in WV's PROMISE scholarship appear to have contributed to its impacts on on-time completion and post-college outcomes (Scott-Clayton, 2011;Scott-Clayton & Zafar, 2019)”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Scott-Clayton & Zafar, 2019

  • Performance-based aid can be effective.

    “The research summarized in Section 3 above suggests that performance-based aid can be effective.”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Scott-Clayton & Zafar, 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 108

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Angrist, J., Autor, D., Hudson, S., & Pallais, A. (2015). Evaluating econometric evaluations of post-secondary aid. American Economic Review, 105(5), 502-07.
  2. Bettinger, E., Gurantz, O., Kawano, L, & Sacerdote, B. (2016). The Long Run Impacts of Merit Aid: Evidence from California's Cal Grant. NBER working paper no. 22347. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
  3. Brown, Meta, John Grigsby, Wilbert van der Klaauw, Jaya Wen, Basit Zafar (2015). "Financial Education and the Debt Behavior of the Young." Review of Financial Studies, Forthcoming.
  4. Chetty, Raj, Nathaniel Hendren, Patrick Kline, and Emmanuel Saez. (2014). Where is the Land of Opportunity? The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in the United States, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(4): 1553-1623.
  5. Chetty, Raj, Nathaniel Hendren, and Lawrence Katz. (2016). The Effects of Exposure to Better Neighborhoods on Children: New Evidence from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment. American Economic Review, 106(4): 855-902.
  6. Cornwell, Christopher M., Kyung Hee Lee, and David B. Mustard. 2005. "Student Responses to Merit Scholarship Retention Rules." Journal of Human Resources 40(4):895-917.
  7. Cornwell, C., Mustard, D., & Sridhar, D. (2006). The enrollment effects of merit-based financial aid: Evidence from Georgia's HOPE Scholarship. Journal of Labor Economics 24: 761- 86.
  8. Dynarski, S. M. (2000). Hope for whom? Financial aid for the middle class and its impact on college attendance. National Tax Journal 53 (3): 629-61.
  9. Dynarski, S. M. (2004). The new merit aid. In Hoxby, C. M. (ed.) College Choices: The Economics of Where to Go, When to Go, and How to Pay for It. University of Chicago Press and the National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 63-100.
  10. Dynarski, S. M. (2008). Building the stock of college-educated labor. Journal of Human Resources 43(3): 576-610.
  11. Dynarski, S. M., & Scott-Clayton, J. (2006). The cost of complexity in federal student aid: Lessons from optimal tax theory and behavioral economics. National Tax Journal 59 (2): 319-56.
  12. Fitzpatrick, M. D., & Jones, D. (2012). Higher education, merit-based scholarships and post- baccalaureate migration. Working Paper No. 18530. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  13. Imbens, Guido, and Thomas Lemieux. 2008. "Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice." Journal of Econometrics 142(2): 615-635.
  14. Lee, D. (2009). Training, Wages, and Sample Selection: Estimating Sharp Bounds on Treatment Effects. Review of Economic Studies, 76(3), 1071-1102.
  15. Manski, C. (1990). Nonparametric Bounds on Treatment Effects. American Economic Review:Papers and Proceedings, 80(2), 319-323.
  16. Mettler, S. (2014). How U.S. higher education promotes inequality-and what can be done to broaden access and graduation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Scholars Strategy Network.
  17. Mian, Atif and Amir Sufi. 2011. "House Prices, Home Equity-Based Borrowing, and the US Household Leverage Crisis." American Economic Review, 101 (august 2011): 2132-2156.
  18. Pallais, A. (2009). Taking a chance on college: Is the Tennessee Education Lottery Scholarship Program a winner? Journal of Human Resources, 44(1), 199-222.
  19. Scott-Clayton, J. (2011). On money and motivation: A quasi-experimental analysis of financial incentives for college achievement. Journal of Human Resources 46 (3): 614-46.
  20. Sjoquist, D. L., & Winters, J. V. (2012). Building the stock of college-educated labor revisited. Journal of Human Resources, 47(1), 270-285.
  21. Zhang, L., & Ness, E. C. (2010). Does state merit-based aid stem brain drain? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(2), 143-165.
  22. Zimmerman, Seth D.. 2014. "The Returns to College Admission for Academically Marginal Students". Journal of Labor Economics 32 (4).

Authors
Scott-Clayton, J., & Zafar, B.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Scott-Clayton, Judith
Venue
Journal of Public Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
170
Pages
68-82
ISSN
0047-2727 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2513347453
Cited by
108
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
26.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Public Economics (publishedVersion)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
  • Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
Funders
Spencer Foundation (201500101)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
university scholarships, student debt, homeownership, neighborhood income, graduate degree attainment, earnings, time to degree completion, college enrollment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review