The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inequality in the impact of the coronavirus shock: Evidence from real time surveys
Open accessAbstract
We present real time survey evidence from the UK, US and Germany showing that the labor market impacts of COVID-19 differ considerably across countries. Employees in Germany, which has a well-established short-time work scheme, are substantially less likely to be affected by the crisis. Within countries, the impacts are highly unequal and exacerbate existing inequalities. Workers in alternative work arrangements and in occupations in which only a small share of tasks can be done from home are more likely to have reduced their hours, lost their jobs and suffered falls in earnings. Less educated workers and women are more affected by the crisis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Calibration Estimators in Survey Sampling
Deville, J.-C., & Särndal, C.-E. (1992) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1992.10475217 · Cited by 1,735
Labor Markets During the COVID-19 Crisis: A Preliminary View
Coibion, O., Gorodnichenko, Y., & Weber, M. (2020) · doi:10.3386/w27017 · Cited by 737
Cited by
How many jobs can be done at home?
Dingel, J. I., & Neiman, B. (2020) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104235 · Cited by 2,055
Learning loss due to school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic
Engzell, P., Frey, A., & Verhagen, M. D. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2022376118 · Cited by 1,848
Poverty, depression, and anxiety: Causal evidence and mechanisms
Ridley, M., Rao, G., Schilbach, F., & Patel, V. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay0214 · Cited by 1,220
A literature review of the economics of COVID-19
Brodeur, A., Gray, D., Islam, A., & Bhuiyan, S. (2021) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.12423 · Cited by 976
“Adams-Prassl et al. (2020a) analyze the inequality of the distributions of job and income losses based on the type of job held and on individual characteristics for the United States and the United Kingdom. The authors find that workers who can perform none of their employment tasks from home are more likely to lose t…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCOVID-19 and Public Transportation: Current Assessment, Prospects, and Research Needs
Tirachini, A., & Cats, O. (2020) · Journal of Public Transportation · doi:10.5038/2375-0901.22.1.1 · Cited by 781
Metadata
- Authors
- Adams-Prassl, A., Boneva, T., Golin, M., & Rauh, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Public Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 189
- Pages
- 104245
- ISSN
- 0047-2727 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3023559614
- Cited by
- 1,410
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 228.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inequality in the impact of the coronavirus shock: Evidence from real time surveys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104245
- The paper
- Adams-Prassl, A., Boneva, T., Golin, M., & Rauh, C. (2020). Inequality in the impact of the coronavirus shock: Evidence from real time surveys. Journal of Public Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104245
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
