Cited by 26Endometriosis Research and TreatmentEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and ManagementEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments

Identification of anti-syntaxin 5 autoantibody as a novel serum marker of endometriosis

Nabeta, Motowo, Abe, Yasuhito, Takaoka, Yuki, Kusanagi, Yasuki, Ito, Masaharu·2011·Journal of Reproductive Immunology

Abstract

The sensitivity and specificity of CA125, as a sole serum marker of endometriosis, are not high enough for routine clinical assessment. To explore new markers for the diagnosis of endometriosis, serum autoantibodies in endometriotic patients were investigated employing a fibroblast cell line, two-dimensional (2D) gel electrophoresis and Western blotting. Proteins reacting with serum autoantibodies by Western blotting were identified using MASCOT analysis. ELISAs were then prepared using recombinant proteins and titers of serum autoantibodies were determined in the endometriotic patients, disease controls, and healthy subjects. Among the autoantibodies identified, anti-syntaxin 5 (STX5) autoantibody levels were significantly elevated in endometriotic patients. Sensitivity (53.6%) and accuracy (72.2%) of the serum anti-STX5 autoantibody assay were better than those of serum CA125 levels (36.2% and 62.9%, respectively) for diagnosis. The sensitivity of anti-STX5 autoantibody was remarkably high in Stage II (80.0%) compared with that of CA125 (40.0%). A combination assay of anti-STX5 autoantibody with CA125 improved the overall sensitivity to 69.6%. We conclude that serum anti-STX5 autoantibody, which was discovered by a proteomic approach, is a potential new serum marker for the diagnosis of endometriosis. This initial study now requires validation by further clinical evaluation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jri.2011.04.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Serum anti-PDIK1L and anti-syntaxin 5 autoantibodies were reported elevated in endometriosis patients.

    “Additionally, serum anti-PDIK1L [77] and anti-syntaxin 5 autoantibodies [78] were reported elevated in endometriosis patients.”

    From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [78]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 26

Authors
Nabeta, M., Abe, Y., Takaoka, Y., Kusanagi, Y., & Ito, M.
Affiliations
  • Ehime University (JP)
  • Ehime Prefectural University of Health Science (JP)
Corresponding author
Abe, Yasuhito
Venue
Journal of Reproductive Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
91
Issue
1-2
Pages
48-55
ISSN
0165-0378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105095730
Cited by
26
References
24
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Reproductive Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Keywords
endometriosis, serum biomarkers, CA125, sensitivity and specificity, endometriosis staging
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Autoantibodies, Cell Line, Endometriosis, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Biomarkers, Qa-SNARE Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review