Interpersonal rigidity and complementarity
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Interpersonal flexibility, a personality trait capturing the ability to alter behavior in different social situations and flexibly use a variety of behaviors, heightens leaders' behavioral flexibility.
“Another characteristic that heightens leaders' behavioral flexibility is their interpersonal flexibility, a personality trait that captures the ability to alter behavior in different social situations and to flexibly use a variety of behaviors in different situations”
From Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams. (2020) · cites this paper as Tracey, 2005
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 58 · Cited by 61
- Authors
- Tracey, T. J. G.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tracey, Terence J.G.
- ORCID
- Tracey, Terence J.G.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Personality
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 592-614
- ISSN
- 0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032627688
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 1.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- interpersonal distress, Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, dyadic interaction, behavioral flexibility, interpersonal communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
