CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 175Coal and Its By-productsRecycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials productionWaste Management and Environmental Impact

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Suitability of leaching test methods for fly ash and slag: A review

Open access
Tiwari, Manoj Kumar, Bajpai, Samir, Dewangan, U.K., Tamrakar, Raunak Kumar·2015·Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
DOI 10.1016/j.jrras.2015.06.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Fly ash and slag leachate pollution can be of great environmental concern due to generation of these wastes in huge quantities from their respective industrial units, mainly coal-based thermal power plants and iron and steel plants. For simulation of natural leaching in laboratory, various leaching methods are available, but selection of a method that can exactly simulate the real-life scenario for accurate estimation of various pollutants is challenging; particularly, the heavy metals present and impact due to reuse or disposal of these wastes. For choosing the most suitable leaching method according to specific situation, one must primarily consider the chemical and physical properties of wastes, the composition of the source, age of waste disposal, and the climatic conditions of the disposal area. Since these factors may not be specified, a variety of leaching methods with relevant equipment have been proposed by researchers; that are based on their required information to particular conditions in absence of a prescribed protocol and non standardization of equipment. The present review is an attempt to investigate the suitable leaching method for coal fly ash and slag.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrras.2015.06.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Ahmad, 2012, Impact of coal based thermal power plant on environment and its mitigation measure, IRJES, 1, 60
  2. Al-Abed, 2006, Science of the Total Environment, 364, 14, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.10.021 · DOI
  3. Arain, 2008, Speciation of heavy metals in sediment by conventional, ultrasound and microwave assisted single extraction methods: a comparison with modified sequential extraction procedure, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 154, 998, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.004 · DOI
  4. Arroyo, 2010, Precipitation of germanium from coal fly ash leachates, Coal Combustion and Gasification Products, 2, 28, 10.4177/CCGP-D-09-00021.1 · DOI
  5. Baba, 2004, Leaching characteristics of solid wastes from thermal power plants of western Turkey and comparison of toxicity methodologies, Journal of Environmental Management, 73, 199, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.06.005 · DOI
  6. Barna, 1997, Leaching behavior of pollutants in stabilized/solidified wastes, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 52, 287, 10.1016/S0304-3894(96)01813-4 · DOI
  7. Barman, 2012, A study on leaching behavior of Na, Ca and K using column leach test, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 70
  8. Brubaker, 2013, Coal fly ash interaction with environmental fluids: geochemical and strontium isotope results from combined column and batch leaching experiments, Applied Geochemistry, 32, 184, 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.09.001 · DOI
  9. Chezom, 2013, Comparative study of different leaching procedures, International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science, 1
  10. Danielowska, 2006, Heavy metals in fly ash from a coal-fired power station in Poland, Journal of Environmental Studies, 15, 943
  11. Delay, 2007, Comparison of leaching tests to determine and quantify the release of inorganic contaminants in demolition waste, Waste Management, 27, 248, 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.01.013 · DOI
  12. Demotica, 2012, Characterization and leaching assessment of ferronickel slag from a smelting plant in Iligan City, Philippines, International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 3
  13. Georgakopoulos, 2002, Leachability of major and trace elements of fly ash from Ptolemais Power Station, Northern Greece, Energy Sources, 24, 103, 10.1080/00908310252774426 · DOI
  14. Georgakopoulos, 2002, leachability of major and trace elements of fly ash from ptolemais power station, Northern Greece, Energy Sources, 24, 103, 10.1080/00908310252774426 · DOI
  15. Hassett, 2005, Leaching of CCBs: observations from over 25 years of research, Fuel, 84, 1378, 10.1016/j.fuel.2004.10.016 · DOI
  16. Hassett, 1994, Scientifically valid leaching of coal conversion of solid residues to predict environmental impact, Fuel Processing Technology, 39, 445, 10.1016/0378-3820(94)90198-8 · DOI
  17. Hesbach, 2010, Serial batch leaching procedure for characterization of coal fly ash, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 168, 523, 10.1007/s10661-009-1132-1 · DOI
  18. Indian minerals yearbook 2012 (part-II : Metals & alloys) (51st ed.).
  19. Jankowski, 2006, Mobility of trace elements from selected Australian fly ashes and its potential impacts on aquatic ecosystems, Journal of Fuel, 85, 243, 10.1016/j.fuel.2005.05.028 · DOI
  20. Juvelyn, 2012, characterization and leaching assesment of ferronickel slag from a smelting plant ini iligan city Philippines, International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 3, 470
  21. Kalembkiewicz, 2015, Efficiency of leaching tests in the context of the influence of the fly ash on the environment, Journal of Ecological Engineering, 16, 67, 10.12911/22998993/589 · DOI
  22. Kazi, 2006, An ultrasonic assisted extraction method to release heavy metals from untreated sewage sludge samples, Chemosphere, 63, 411, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.08.056 · DOI
  23. Kim, 2009, Comparison of fly ash leaching methods, Fuel, 88, 926, 10.1016/j.fuel.2008.11.013 · DOI
  24. Kim, 2003, Solubility of cations in class F fly ash, Environmental Science & Technology, 37, 4507, 10.1021/es0263691 · DOI
  25. Kosson, 2002, An integrated framework for evaluating leaching in waste management and utilization of secondary materials, Environmental Engineering Science, 19, 159, 10.1089/109287502760079188 · DOI
  26. Leaching Methods: 1313, 1314, 1315, ASTM D3987-85. · DOI
  27. Lokeshappa, 2012, Fate of metals in coal fly ash ponds, International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 3
  28. Morar, 2011, Leaching of metals from fly ash-amended permeable reactive barriers, Journal of Environmental Engineering
  29. Nalawade, 2012, Assessment of groundwater and surface water quality indices for heavy metals nearby area of parli thermal power plant, Universal Journal of Environmental Research and Technology, 2, 47
  30. Ogunro, 2003, Relating batch and column diffusion coefficients for leachable contaminants in particulate waste materials, Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE, 12
  31. Praharaj, 2002, Leachability of elements from sub bituminous coal fly ash from India, Environmental International, 27, 609, 10.1016/S0160-4120(01)00118-0 · DOI
  32. Prasad, 2008, Heavy metal leaching in Indian fly ash, Journal of Environmental Science & Engineering, 50, 127
  33. Sarade, 2010, Extraction and leaching of heavy metals from thermal power plant fly ash and its admixtures, Journal of Environmental Studies, 19, 1325
  34. Sauer, 2011, Trace elements leaching from organic soils stabilized with high carbon fly ash, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
  35. Shanmuganathan, 2008, Toxicity characterization and long-term stability studies on copper slag from the ISASMELT process, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52, 601, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.08.001 · DOI
  36. Shivpuri, 2011, Metal leaching potential in coal fly ash, American Journal of Environmental Engineering, 1, 21, 10.5923/j.ajee.20110101.04 · DOI
  37. van der Sloot, 1998, Quick Techniques for Evaluating the Leaching Properties of Waste Materials: Their Relation to Decisions on Utilization and Disposal, Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 17, 298, 10.1016/S0165-9936(98)00010-7 · DOI
  38. van der Sloot, 1996, Developments in evaluationg environmental impact from utilization of bulk inert wastes using laboratory leaching test and field verification, Ware Management, 16, 65
  39. Sushil, 2006, Analysis of fly ash heavy metal content and disposal in three thermal power plants in India, Fuel, 85, 2676, 10.1016/j.fuel.2006.04.031 · DOI
  40. Thorneloe, S. A. Improved leaching test methods for environmental assessment of coal ash and recycled materials used in construction. In Proceedings Sardinia 2009, twelfth international waste management and landfill symposium.
  41. USEPA. 1997. Land Disposal Restrictions Phase III–Emergency Extension of the K088 Capacity Variance. Federal Register: January 14, 1997 (Vol. 62, No. 9).
  42. Yilmaz, 2003, Comparison of two leaching tests to assess the effectiveness of cement-based hazardous waste solidification/stabilization, Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences, 27, 201
  43. Ziemkiewicz, 2011, Selenium leaching kinetics and in-situ control, Mine Water Environ, 30, 141, 10.1007/s10230-011-0154-4 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tiwari, M. K., Bajpai, S., Dewangan, U. K., & Tamrakar, R. K.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Technology Raipur (IN)
  • Indian Institute of Technology Bhilai (IN)
Corresponding author
Tamrakar, Raunak Kumar
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
523-537
ISSN
1687-8507 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jrras.2015.06.003
OpenAlex
W927546726
Cited by
175
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12
FWCI
16.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Coal and Its By-products
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Environmental Impact
Keywords
leaching tests, fly ash, slag, heavy metals, leachate pollution, coal fly ash, industrial waste, waste disposal, waste reuse, iron and steel plant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review