Cited by 300Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentAgricultural economics and policiesAgriculture and Rural Development Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The economic potential of agroecology: Empirical evidence from Europe

Open access
van der Ploeg, Jan Douwe, Barjolle, Dominique, Bruil, Janneke, Brunori, Gianluca, Costa Madureira, Livia Maria, Dessein, Joost, Drąg, Zbigniew, Fink-Kessler, Andrea, Gasselin, Pierre, Gonzalez de Molina, Manuel, Gorlach, Krzysztof, Jürgens, Karin, Kinsella, Jim, Kirwan, James, Knickel, Karlheinz, Lucas, Veronique, Marsden, Terry, Maye, Damian, Migliorini, Paola, Milone, Pierluigi, Noe, Egon, Nowak, Piotr, Parrott, Nicholas, Peeters, Alain, Rossi, Adanella, Schermer, Markus, Ventura, Flaminia, Visser, Marjolein, Wezel, Alexander·2019·Journal of Rural Studies

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.09.003

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 54 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Bogue, 2013, Impact of participation in Teagasc dairy discussion groups: evaluation report (january 2013), Teagasc Broadmore Res.
  2. Cayre, 2018, The coexistence of multiple worldviews in livestock farming drives agroecological transition: a case study in French Protected Designation of Origin (DOP) cheese mountain areas, vol. 10, 1097
  3. Devienne, 2017, Les systèmes de production économes et autonomes pour répondre aux enjeux agricoles d'aujourd'hui, Collection THEMA, Commissariat Général au Développement Curable, 43
  4. Dillon, 2016, Chapter 1: financial management in proceedings of the better farm beef programme: end of phase 2 conference, Tullamore
  5. Gazzarin, 2018, Milchproduktion: frischgras mit wenig kraftfutter zahlt sich aus, vol. 9, 148
  6. Lamine, 2017, Values and volumes in sustainable organic market chains: a multi-perspectival analysis, Int. J. Sociol. Agric. Food, 24, 15
  7. Migliorini, 2018, Old and new common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties in organic zero-input: connecting agronomic, microorganism, phytochemical and bread sensory characteristics, J. Food Agric. Environ., 16, 22
  8. Owen, 1966, The double developmental squeeze on agriculture, Am. Econ. Rev., LVI, pp43
  9. Talamini, 2010, Merging netchain and social network. Introducing the social netchain as a analytical framework in the agribusiness sector, Afr. J. Bus. Manag., 4, 2981

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 300

Metadata

Authors
van der Ploeg, J. D., Barjolle, D., Bruil, J., Brunori, G., Costa Madureira, L. M., Dessein, J., Drąg, Z., Fink-Kessler, A., Gasselin, P., Gonzalez de Molina, M., Gorlach, K., Jürgens, K., Kinsella, J., Kirwan, J., Knickel, K., Lucas, V., Marsden, T., Maye, D., Migliorini, P., Milone, P., Noe, E., Nowak, P., Parrott, N., Peeters, A., Rossi, A., Schermer, M., Ventura, F., Visser, M., & Wezel, A.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • University of Pisa (IT)
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Jagiellonian University (PL)
  • Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • University of Gloucestershire (GB)
  • Ruralis - Institute for Rural and Regional Research (NO)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • University of Gastronomic Sciences (IT)
  • University of Perugia (IT)
Venue
Journal of Rural Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
71
Issue
online first
Pages
46-61
ISSN
0743-0167 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2966748053
Cited by
299
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 3
FWCI
57.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Rural Studies (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire) (submittedVersion)
  • Homo Politicus (Academy of Humanities and Economics in Lodz) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • The Journal of Peasant Studies
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Development › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Agricultural economics and policies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Agriculture and Rural Development Research
Keywords
agroecology, agroecological farming systems, farm income, economic profitability, agricultural policy, sustainable agriculture, agricultural employment, European agriculture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review