What farmers want from mental health and wellbeing-focused websites and online interventions
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Web-based interventions have been identified as acceptable in difficult-to-reach populations such as farmers.
“web-based interventions have been identified as acceptable in difficult-to-reach populations such as farmers [20]”
From Web-Based Interventions to Help Australian Adults Address Depression, Anxiety, Suicidal Ideation, and General Mental Well-being: Scoping Review (2022) · cites this paper as [20]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 56
- Authors
- Gunn, K. M., Barrett, A., Hughes-Barton, D., Turnbull, D., Short, C. E., Brumby, S., Skaczkowski, G., & Dollman, J.
- Affiliations
- University of South Australia (AU)
- Freemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Deakin University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Gunn, Kate M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Rural Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-08
- Volume
- 86
- Pages
- 298-308
- ISSN
- 0743-0167 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3174952321
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Rural Studies (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture and Farm Safety
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Keywords
- farmer mental health, farmer well-being, online intervention, mental health websites, internet use, user preferences, web design, mental health stigma, social isolation, social media, early intervention, help-seeking, mental health promotion, rural health, barriers to mental health care, engagement strategies, Australia, grain producers, time poverty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
