CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 130Sports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of strength training variables on strength gains in adults over 55 years-old: a meta-analysis of dose-response relationships.

Open access
Silva, Nádia L., Oliveira, Ricardo B., Fleck, Steven J., Leon, Antonio C.M.P., Farinatti, Paulo·2014·Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
DOI 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.05.009
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Objectives The importance of strength training to elderly individuals is well established. However, the dose-response relationship of the benefits of strength training in this population is unclear. The purpose of the study was to use meta-analysis to investigate the dose-response of the effects of strength training in elderly individuals.Design Fifteen studies with a total of 84 effect-sizes were included. The analyses examined the dose-response relationships of the following training variables 'intensity', 'number of sets', 'weekly frequency', and 'training duration' on strength improvement.Methods The studies selected met the following inclusion criteria: (a) randomized controlled trials; (b) trained healthy subjects of both genders; (c) trained subjects aged 55 years or older; (d) strength increases were determined pre- and post-training; (e) use of similar strength evaluation techniques (strength determined by a repetition maximum test) and training routine (dynamic concentric-eccentric knee extension exercise to train the quadriceps muscle group). The effect-sizes were calculated using fixed and random effect models with the main effects determined by meta-regression.Results Many combinations of training variables resulted in strength increases. However meta-regression indicated only "training duration" had a significant dose-response relationship to strength gains (p=0.001). Over durations of 8-52 weeks, longer training durations had a greater effect on strength gains compared to shorter duration protocols.Conclusions Resistive training causes strength gains in elderly individuals, provided the training duration is sufficiently long, regardless of the combination of other training variables.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.05.009

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Silva, 2007, Influence of counter-resistance training variables on elderly muscular strength: a systematic review with emphasis on dose/response relationships, Braz J Sports Med [on line], 13, 60
  2. Rabelo, 2004, Effects of resistance training on activities of daily living in older women, Biol Sport, 21, 325
  3. DeBeliso, 2005, A comparison of periodised and fixed repetition training protocol on strength in older adults, J Sci Med Sport, 8, 190, 10.1016/S1440-2440(05)80010-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 130

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Silva, N. L., Oliveira, R. B., Fleck, S. J., Leon, A. C. M. P., & Farinatti, P.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (BR)
  • Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
  • University of Wisconsin–Parkside (US)
Corresponding author
Farinatti, Paulo
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
337-344
ISSN
1440-2440 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jsams.2013.05.009
OpenAlex
W1991008966
Cited by
129
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of science and medicine in sport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (305729/2006-3)
  • Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (E-26/, 305729/2006-3)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
resistance training, older adults, dose-response relationship, training duration, exercise intensity, exercise frequency, muscle strength gain, knee extension exercise, quadriceps
MeSH terms
Aged, Humans, Middle Aged, Muscle Contraction, Physical Endurance, Exercise, Muscle, Skeletal, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review