Cited by 355Physical Activity and HealthChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentChild Development and Education

Systematic review of physical activity and cognitive development in early childhood

Open access
Carson, Valerie, Hunter, Stephen, Kuzik, Nicholas, Wiebe, Sandra A., Spence, John C., Friedman, Alinda, Tremblay, Mark S., Slater, Linda +1 more·2016·Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To comprehensively review all observational and experimental studies examining the relationship between physical activity and cognitive development during early childhood (birth to 5 years). DESIGN Systematic review. METHODS Electronic databases were searched in July, 2014. No study design, date, or language limits were imposed on the search. Included studies had to be published, peer reviewed articles that satisfied the a priori determined population (apparently healthy children aged birth to 5 years), intervention (duration, intensity, frequency, or patterns of physical activity), comparator (various durations, intensity, or patterns of physical activity), and outcome (cognitive development) study criteria. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed in December 2014. RESULTS A total of seven studies, representing 414 participants from five different countries met the inclusion criteria, including two observational and five experimental studies. Six studies found increased or higher duration/frequency of physical activity had statistically significant (p<0.05) beneficial effects on at least one cognitive development outcome, including 67% of the outcomes assessed in the executive function domain and 60% in the language domain. No study found that increased or higher duration/frequency of physical activity had statistically significant detrimental effects on cognitive development. Six of the seven studies were rated weak quality with a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS This review provides some preliminary evidence that physical activity may have beneficial effects on cognitive development during early childhood. Given the shortage of the information and the weak quality of available evidence, future research is needed to strengthen the evidence base in this area.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.07.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 355

Authors
Carson, V., Hunter, S., Kuzik, N., Wiebe, S. A., Spence, J. C., Friedman, A., Tremblay, M. S., Slater, L., & Hinkley, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Carson, Valerie
Venue
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
19
Issue
7
Pages
573-578
ISSN
1440-2440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W815316258
Cited by
355
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of science and medicine in sport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Norlien Foundation
  • Alberta Family Wellness Initiative (AFWI)
  • Alberta Centre for Child, Family and Community Research (ACCFCR)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Education
Keywords
physical activity, cognitive development, early childhood, executive function, language development
MeSH terms
Clinical Studies as Topic, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review