Establishing a relationship between the effect of caffeine and duration of endurance athletic time trial events: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objectives Caffeine has well-documented benefits on endurance athletic performance. Because of caffeine's ergogenic effects of reducing perceived fatigue, it is hypothesized that as duration of athletic event increases, so will the effect size of caffeine upon performance. This study aims to examine the relationship between duration of endurance athletic event and the effect size of caffeine compared to placebo for athletic performance. Design A systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials assessing the effects of caffeine in adults performing endurance athletic events. Methods We searched MedLine, Web of Science, and review article references published through March 2016. We performed meta-analyses on placebo-controlled trials to determine the effect of the duration of an endurance athletic event on the standardized mean difference (Cohen's d) between the caffeine and placebo groups for athletic performance. Results Forty articles including 56 unique comparison groups were included. Pooled results showed a Cohen's d of 0.33 (95% CI=0.21, 0.45; p=1.00; I 2 =0%). The effect of the duration of athletic event was significantly associated with Cohen's d (Relative Risk: 0.005; 95% CI=0.001, 0.009; p=0.024). For a 30min increase in duration of the athletic event, Cohen's d will increase by 0.150. Conclusions This study is the first to report on the statistical finding that the effect size of caffeine increases along with the increasing duration of the time trial…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Caffeine improves performance by attenuating potassium output of muscle cells.
“it improves performance by attenuating the potassium output of muscle cells [13]”
From Dietary and Ergogenic Supplementation to Improve Elite Soccer Players’ Performance (2021) · cites this paper as [13]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 61 · Cited by 75
- Authors
- Shen, J. G., Brooks, M. B., Cincotta, J., & Manjourides, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Northeastern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shen, Joy G.
- Venue
- Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 232-238
- ISSN
- 1440-2440 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2888519456
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of science and medicine in sport (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Harvard University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
- Keywords
- caffeine, endurance performance, ergogenic aids, effect size, endurance athletes, subjective fatigue
- MeSH terms
- Central Nervous System Stimulants, Caffeine, Humans, Physical Endurance, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Athletic Performance, Athletes, Performance-Enhancing Substances
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review