Cited by 75Coffee research and impactsSports Performance and TrainingThermoregulation and physiological responses

Establishing a relationship between the effect of caffeine and duration of endurance athletic time trial events: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Shen, Joy G., Brooks, Meredith B., Cincotta, Jessica, Manjourides, Justin D.·2019·Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

Abstract

Objectives Caffeine has well-documented benefits on endurance athletic performance. Because of caffeine's ergogenic effects of reducing perceived fatigue, it is hypothesized that as duration of athletic event increases, so will the effect size of caffeine upon performance. This study aims to examine the relationship between duration of endurance athletic event and the effect size of caffeine compared to placebo for athletic performance. Design A systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials assessing the effects of caffeine in adults performing endurance athletic events. Methods We searched MedLine, Web of Science, and review article references published through March 2016. We performed meta-analyses on placebo-controlled trials to determine the effect of the duration of an endurance athletic event on the standardized mean difference (Cohen's d) between the caffeine and placebo groups for athletic performance. Results Forty articles including 56 unique comparison groups were included. Pooled results showed a Cohen's d of 0.33 (95% CI=0.21, 0.45; p=1.00; I 2 =0%). The effect of the duration of athletic event was significantly associated with Cohen's d (Relative Risk: 0.005; 95% CI=0.001, 0.009; p=0.024). For a 30min increase in duration of the athletic event, Cohen's d will increase by 0.150. Conclusions This study is the first to report on the statistical finding that the effect size of caffeine increases along with the increasing duration of the time trial…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.07.022

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 61 · Cited by 75

Authors
Shen, J. G., Brooks, M. B., Cincotta, J., & Manjourides, J. D.
Affiliations
Northeastern University (US)
Corresponding author
Shen, Joy G.
Venue
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
232-238
ISSN
1440-2440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2888519456
Cited by
75
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of science and medicine in sport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Harvard University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Keywords
caffeine, endurance performance, ergogenic aids, effect size, endurance athletes, subjective fatigue
MeSH terms
Central Nervous System Stimulants, Caffeine, Humans, Physical Endurance, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Athletic Performance, Athletes, Performance-Enhancing Substances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review