The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing competence in the use of motivational interviewing
Abstract
This report presents reliability, validity and sensitivity indices for the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) scale. Factor analysis of MI treatment sessions coded with the Motivational Interviewing Skills Code (MISC) was used to derive 10 elements of MI practice, forming the MITI. Canonical correlation revealed that the MITI captured 59% of the variability in the MISC. Reliability estimates for the MITI were derived using three masked, independent coders. Intra-class coefficients ranged from .5 to .9 and were generally in the good to excellent range. Comparison of MITI scores before and after MI workshops indicate good sensitivity for detecting improvement in clinical practice as result of training. Implications for the use of this instrument in research and supervision are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Screening, brief intervention, and referral for treatment (SBIRT) is an evidence-based model for reduction in alcohol consumption in primary care health settings in the Western world.”
Citations
Cites
Cicchetti, D. V. (1994) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284 · Cited by 9,349
Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002) · Cited by 7,002
Self-citation(1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,438
Self-citationWhat is Motivational Interviewing?
Rollnick, S., & Miller, W. R. (1995) · Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1017/s135246580001643x · Cited by 1,737
Self-citationBrief interventions for alcohol problems: a review
BIEN, T. H., MILLER, W. R., & TONIGAN, J. S. (1993) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb00820.x · Cited by 1,577
Self-citationThe heart and soul of change: What works in therapy.
Hubble, M. A. (1999) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/11132-000 · Cited by 1,403
A Randomized Trial of Methods to Help Clinicians Learn Motivational Interviewing.
Miller, W. R., Yahne, C. E., Moyers, T. B., Martinez, J., & Pirritano, M. (2004) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.72.6.1050 · Cited by 1,075
Self-citationTesting the integrity of a psychotherapy protocol: Assessment of adherence and competence
Waltz, J., Addis, M. E., Koerner, K., & Jacobson, N. S. (1993) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.61.4.620 · Cited by 873
Client commitment language during motivational interviewing predicts drug use outcomes.
Amrhein, P. C., Miller, W. R., Yahne, C. E., Palmer, M., & Fulcher, L. (2003) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.71.5.862 · Cited by 729
Self-citationMiller, W. R., & Mount, K. (2001) · Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1017/s1352465801004064 · Cited by 490
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward a theory of motivational interviewing
Miller, W. R., & Rose, G. S. (2009) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0016830 · Cited by 1,603
Self-citationPsilocybin-assisted treatment for alcohol dependence: A proof-of-concept study
Bogenschutz, M. P., Forcehimes, A. A., Pommy, J. A., Wilcox, C. E., Barbosa, P., & Strassman, R. J. (2015) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881114565144 · Cited by 1,151
Beidas, R. S., & Kendall, P. C. (2010) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.2009.01187.x · Cited by 1,085
The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trials
Borrelli, B. (2011) · Journal of Public Health Dentistry · doi:10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00233.x · Cited by 970
Teixeira, P. J., Carraça, E. V., Marques, M. M., Rutter, H., Oppert, J.-M., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Lakerveld, J., & Brug, J. (2015) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0323-6 · Cited by 711
Metadata
- Authors
- Moyers, T. B., Martin, T., Manuel, J. K., Hendrickson, S. M. L., & Miller, W. R.
- Affiliations
- University of New Mexico (US)
- Corresponding author
- Moyers, Theresa B.
- Venue
- Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-26
- ISSN
- 0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037776127
- Cited by
- 738
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 58
- FWCI
- 12.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01 AA 13696-01, R01AA013696)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA 13801)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Keywords
- motivational interviewing, implementation fidelity, clinical competence assessment, inter-rater reliability, sensitivity to change, clinical training evaluation, clinical supervision, addiction treatment
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Competence, Educational Measurement, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Psychotherapy, Sensitivity and Specificity, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
