Cited by 26Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

An intervention program for ADHD in patients with substance use disorders: Preliminary results of a field trial

Open access
Goossensen, M. Anne, van de Glind, Geurt, Carpentier, Pieter-Jan, Wijsen, Riek M.A., van Duin, Daniëlle, Kooij, J.J. Sandra·2006·Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Abstract

The comorbidity of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is frequently not well recognized in substance abuse treatment institutions in The Netherlands. As a consequence, patients with substance use disorder (SUD) and ADHD often receive suboptimal treatment. To prevent every treatment center from having to invent its own diagnostic procedure and intervention for ADHD, a national working group was established. This group developed an intervention program for the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of ADHD in patients with SUD. This article describes the development and content of this intervention program. An important part of this development was testing the intervention program in two addiction treatment centers in The Netherlands. Systematic screening of ADHD was part of the test. A self-report questionnaire was used. Subjects with positive screening results were referred for the diagnostic procedure. Nine hundred twenty-eight screenings were performed: 207 screened positive, 115 came for further diagnostics, and 65 were ultimately diagnosed with ADHD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsat.2005.12.004

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 26

Authors
Goossensen, M. A., van de Glind, G., Carpentier, P.-J., Wijsen, R. M. A., van Duin, D., & Kooij, J. J. S.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Reinier van Arkel (NL)
  • PsyQ (NL)
Corresponding author
Goossensen, M. Anne
Venue
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-04
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
253-259
ISSN
0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103817236
Cited by
26
References
29
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
ZonMw
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, substance use disorders, ADHD screening, ADHD diagnosis, ADHD treatment, comorbidities, addiction treatment centers, intervention program development, self-report questionnaire
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Clinical Protocols, Education, Family, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Peer Group, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Social Support, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review