A systematic review of emergency care brief alcohol interventions for injury patients.
Abstract
This article examines 14 studies that assessed the effectiveness of brief interventions (BIs) delivered to injury patients in emergency care settings. The aims were to review findings concerning the effectiveness of providing BI in these settings and to explore factors contributing to its effectiveness. Of the 12 studies that compared pre- and post-BI results, 11 observed a significant effect of BI on at least some of the outcomes: alcohol intake, risky drinking practices, alcohol-related negative consequences, and injury frequency. Two studies assessed only post-BI results. More intensive interventions tended to yield more favorable results. BI patients achieved greater reductions than control group patients, although there was a tendency for the control group(s) to also show improvements. Five studies failed to show significant differences between the compared treatment conditions. Variations in the study protocol, alcohol-related recruitment criteria, screening and assessment methods, and injury severity limit the specific conclusions that can be drawn.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many brief alcohol interventions in trauma settings lower trauma and injury recidivism, which suggests they may also affect aggression.
“This is despite a robust set of studies finding that many brief interventions in trauma settings for alcohol use alone do reduce trauma and injury recidivism, implying that there may be some effect on aggression (Nilsen et al., 2008).”
From Screening and Brief Intervention for Substance Misuse: Does It Reduce Aggression and HIV-Related Risk Behaviours? (2015) · cites this paper as Nilsen et al., 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 67 · Cited by 207
- Authors
- Nilsen, P., Baird, J., Mello, M. J., Nirenberg, T., Woolard, R., Bendtsen, P., & Longabaugh, R.
- Affiliations
- Brown University (US)
- Linköping University (SE)
- Venue
- Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 184-201
- ISSN
- 0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996307376
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 1.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (1R01AA13709-01A1, R01AA013709)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
- Keywords
- brief alcohol intervention, emergency care, trauma patients, alcohol-related injuries, hazardous drinking, alcohol-related negative consequences, alcohol consumption, injury frequency, intervention intensity, alcohol screening
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Alcohol Drinking, Emergency Medical Services, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Brief, Wounds and Injuries, Alcohol-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review