Cited by 28Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Young adults with co-occurring disorders: substance use disorder treatment response and outcomes

Open access
Bergman, Brandon G., Greene, M. Claire, Slaymaker, Valerie, Hoeppner, Bettina B., Kelly, John F.·2014·Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Abstract

Compared to other life stages, young adulthood (ages 18-24) is characterized by qualitative differences including the highest rates of co-occurring substance use and psychiatric disorders (COD). Little is known, however, regarding young adults' response to substance use disorder (SUD) treatment, especially those with COD. Greater knowledge in this area could inform and enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of SUD care for this patient population. The current study investigated differences between 141 COD and 159 SUD-only young adults attending psychiatrically-integrated residential SUD treatment on intake characteristics, during-treatment changes on clinical targets (e.g., coping skills; abstinence self-efficacy), and outcomes during the year post-discharge. Contrary to expectations, despite more severe clinical profiles at intake, COD patients showed similar during-treatment improvements on clinical target variables, and comparable post-treatment abstinence rates and psychiatric symptoms. Clinicians referring young adults with COD to specialized care may wish to consider residential SUD treatment programs that integrate evidence-based psychiatric services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsat.2013.11.005

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Specific to emerging adults, existing research has shown potential benefits from cognitive-behavioural and motivational interventions, integrated mental health and substance use treatment, and higher emerging adult retention when programs include CBT.

    “Specific to emerging adults, though limited, existing research has shown potential benefits from cognitive-behavioural and motivational interventions, integrated mental health and substance use treatment, and higher emerging adult retention when programs include CBT (6, 48, 49).”

    From Initial insights from a quality improvement initiative to develop an evidence-informed young adult substance use program (2022) · cites this paper as [48]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 28

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Derogatis LR 2001 BSI-I8: Brief Symptom Inventory 18 Administration, scoring, and procedures manual Minneapolis, MN NCS Pearson
  2. First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW 2002 Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Patient Edition (SCID-I/P) New York Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute

Authors
Bergman, B. G., Greene, M. C., Slaymaker, V., Hoeppner, B. B., & Kelly, J. F.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Bergman, Brandon G.
Venue
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
420-428
ISSN
0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058062051
Cited by
28
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R21AA018185, K24AA022136)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K01DA027097)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
co-occurring disorders, young adults, addiction treatment, treatment response, abstinence self-efficacy, coping strategies, post-discharge outcomes, psychiatric symptoms, referral to treatment
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Age Factors, Mental Disorders, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Residential Treatment, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Evidence-Based Medicine, Substance-Related Disorders, Self Efficacy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review