Cited by 18Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Treatment and Access

Do improvements in substance use and mental health symptoms during treatment translate to long-term outcomes in the opposite domain?

Open access
Ramchand, Rajeev, Griffin, Beth Ann, Slaughter, Mary Ellen, Almirall, Daniel, McCaffrey, Daniel F.·2014·Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Abstract

Providers who treat adolescents with co-occurring substance use and mental health issues may prioritize treatment of one set of symptoms believing that improvements in one domain will result in improvements of the other. However, limited empirical data for adolescents provide evidence of such "spillover effects." Using data from 2900 youth in an outpatient treatment, we examined whether during-treatment changes in substance use or mental health symptoms predicted 12-month outcomes in the analogous and opposite domains. There was very little evidence of spillover effects, only that youth with no internal distress at 0 and 3 months reported lower levels of substance use problems at 12-months relative to youth with internal distress that stayed the same from 0 to 3 months. These findings suggest that providers treat both sets of substance use and mental health symptoms in an integrated manner given that these symptoms commonly co-occur among youth with either set.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.06.012

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The youth SUD treatment literature has not shown that treating only one co-occurring mental health or SUD condition produces benefits for the other.

    “youth SUD treatment literature has not found “spillover benefits” from treating only one co-occurring MH or SUD condition [22]”

    From Interventions for prevention and treatment of substance use in youth with traumatic childhood experiences: a systematic review and synthesis of the literature (2024) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports little evidence that improvement in one domain during adolescent substance-use treatment predicted better 12-month outcomes in the other. But the Introduction (page unavailable) notes some evidence that effective mental-health treatment may prevent subsequent substance-use disorders. The claim’s categorical statement that the youth literature has found no spillover benefits overstates the source. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Integrated or at least coordinated simultaneous treatment is recommended for most cases.

    “recommending integrated, or at least coordinated simultaneous treatment in most cases [22, 23]”

    From Interventions for prevention and treatment of substance use in youth with traumatic childhood experiences: a systematic review and synthesis of the literature (2024) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Discussion recommends treating both substance-use and mental-health symptoms in an integrated manner and describes treatment planning and care coordination as a possible approach. But the recommendation concerns youth with co-occurring symptoms; the paper does not establish that it applies to most cases generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 18

Authors
Ramchand, R., Griffin, B. A., Slaughter, M. E., Almirall, D., & McCaffrey, D. F.
Affiliations
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Ramchand, Rajeev
Venue
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
339-346
ISSN
0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985874377
Cited by
18
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (27007-0191, 2702003-00006)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA017507, P50DA010075, R01DA015697)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
spillover effects, substance use, psychiatric symptoms, adolescents, co-occurring disorders, outpatient care, treatment outcomes, integrated treatment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Child, Community Mental Health Services, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Psychotherapy, Treatment Outcome, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review