Mind the gap: Micro-expansion joints drastically decrease the bending of FIB-milled cryo-lamellae
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Cryo-focused ion beam (FIB)-milling of biological samples can be used to generate thin electron-transparent slices from cells grown or deposited on EM grids. These so called cryo-lamellae allow high-resolution structural studies of the natural cellular environment by in situ cryo-electron tomography. However, the cryo-lamella workflow is a low-throughput technique and can easily be hindered by technical issues like the bending of the lamellae during the final cryo-FIB-milling steps. The severity of lamella bending seems to correlate with crinkling of the EM grid support film at cryogenic temperatures, which could generate tensions that may be transferred onto the thin lamella, leading to its bending and breakage. To protect the lamellae from such forces, we milled "micro-expansion joints" alongside the lamellae, creating gaps in the support that can act as physical buffers to safely absorb material motion. We demonstrate that the presence of micro-expansion joints drastically decreases bending of lamellae milled from eukaryotic cells grown and frozen on EM grids. Furthermore, we show that this adaptation does not create additional instabilities that could impede subsequent parts of the cryo-lamella workflow, as we obtained high-quality Volta phase plate tomograms revealing macromolecules in their natural structural context. The minimal additional effort required to implement micro-expansion joints in the cryo-FIB-milling workflow makes them a straightforward solution against cryo-lamella bending to increase the throughput of in situ structural biology studies.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Microexpansion joints increase lamellae stability.
“Microexpansion joints were added during the first step to increase lamellae stability (Wolff et al., 2019).”
From StableMARK-decorated microtubules in cells have expanded lattices (2025) · cites this paper as Wolff et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Engel, B.D., Schaffer, M., Albert, S., Asano, S., Plitzko, J.M., Baumeister, W., 2015. In situ structural analysis of Golgi intracisternal protein arrays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 11264.
- Guo, Q., Lehmer, C., Martínez-Sánchez, A., Rudack, T., Beck, F., Hartmann, H., Pérez-Berlanga, M., Frottin, F., Hipp, M.S., Hartl, F.U., 2018. In situ structure of neuronal C9orf72 poly-GA aggregates reveals proteasome recruitment. Cell 172 (696-705), e612.
- Rigort, A., Bäuerlein, F.J., Villa, E., Eibauer, M., Laugks, T., Baumeister, W., Plitzko, J.M., 2012. Focused ion beam micromachining of eukaryotic cells for cryoelectron tomography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 4449-4454.
- Toro-Nahuelpan, M., Zagoriy, I., Senger, F., Blanchoin, L., Théry, M., Mahamid, J., 2019. Tailoring cryo-electron microscopy grids by photo-micropatterning for in-cell structural studies. bioRxiv, 676189.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
StableMARK-decorated microtubules in cells have expanded lattices
de Jager, L., Jansen, K. I., Hoogebeen, R., Akhmanova, A., Kapitein, L. C., Förster, F., & Howes, S. C. (2025) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.202206143 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wolff, G., Limpens, R. W. A. L., Zheng, S., Snijder, E. J., Agard, D. A., Koster, A. J., & Bárcena, M.
- Affiliations
- Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bárcena, Montserrat
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Structural Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 208
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 107389
- ISSN
- 1047-8477 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2974864174
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12
- FWCI
- 4.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Structural Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- cryo-FIB milling, in situ cryo-electron tomography, eukaryotic cells
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Equipment Design, Frozen Sections, Mice, Electron Microscope Tomography, Workflow
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review