Cited by 41Menopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsEstrogen and related hormone effectsBreast Cancer Treatment Studies

Menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer

Santen, Richard J.·2014·The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

Abstract

Observational and randomized controlled trial data have extensively examined the relationship between menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) and risk of developing breast cancer. A highly influential study from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) in 2002 reported that a MHT regimen of conjugated equine estrogens and medroxyprogesterone acetate increased the risk of breast cancer by 26%. Later reports from the WHI indicated that a MHT regimen with conjugated equine estrogens alone decreased the risk of breast cancer by 23%. Critical re-examination of the WHI study noted that the average participant age was 63, that few women had symptoms, and that the WHI results might not apply to younger, symptomatic women shortly after menopause. Since the original publications, several post hoc analyses and observational studies have stimulated reconsideration of the WHI findings. Emphasis has been directed toward risks in younger women just entering the menopause, the subgroup who are most likely to be considering MHT use. The goal of this treatise is to integrate available mechanistic and clinical information related to the use of estrogen alone or estrogen plus a progestogen for five years or less. These data suggest that estrogen alone neither decreases nor increases risk in younger women initiating therapy close to the time of menopause but decreases risk in older women. Both younger and older women experience an excess risk with estrogen plus a progestogen. The attributable risk in younger…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.06.010

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Santen, R. J.
Affiliations
University of Virginia Health System (US)
Corresponding author
Santen, Richard J.
Venue
The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
142
Pages
52-61
ISSN
0960-0760 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048568101
Cited by
41
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30CA044579)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Keywords
hormone replacement therapy, breast cancer risk, conjugated equine estrogens, medroxyprogesterone acetate, estrogen alone, Women's Health Initiative, occult breast cancer, menopause
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Breast, Breast Neoplasms, Estrogens, Conjugated (USP), Female, Humans, Mammography, Menopause, Middle Aged, Risk, Time Factors, Estrogen Replacement Therapy, Women's Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review