Cited by 52Adrenal Hormones and DisordersMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesHormonal Regulation and Hypertension

Advances in the analytical methodologies: profiling steroids in familiar pathways-challenging dogmas

Bloem, Liezl M., Storbeck, Karl-Heinz, Swart, Pieter, du Toit, Therina, Schloms, Lindie, Swart, Amanda C.·2015·The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

Abstract

The comprehensive evaluation of the adrenal steroidogenic pathway, given its complexity, requires methodology beyond the standard techniques currently employed. Advances in LC-MS/MS, coupled with in vitro cell models that produce all the steroid metabolites of the mineralo-, glucocorticoid and androgen arms, present a powerful approach for the comprehensive evaluation of adrenal steroidogenesis in response to compounds of interest including bioactives, drug treatments and endocrine disrupting compounds. UHPLC-MS/MS analysis of steroid panels in forskolin, angiotensin II and K(+) stimulated H295R cells provides a snapshot of their effect on intermediates and end products of adrenal steroidogenesis. The impact of full steroid panel evaluations by LC- and GC-MS/MS extends to clinical profiling with the characterization of normal pediatric steroid reference ranges in sexual development and of disease-specific profiles improving diagnosis and sub classification. Comprehensive analyses of steroid profiles may potentially improve patient outcomes together with the application of treatments specifically suited to clinical subgroups. LC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS applications in the analyses of comprehensive steroid panels are demonstrated in clinical conditions such as congenital adrenal hyperplasia in newborns requiring accurate diagnoses and in predicting metabolic risk in polycystic ovary syndrome patients. Most notable perhaps is the impact of LC-MS/MS evaluations on our understanding of the basic biochemistry of steroidogenesis with the detection of the long forgotten adrenal steroid, 11β-hydroxyandrostenedione, at significant levels. The characterization of its metabolism to androgen receptor ligands in the LNCaP prostate cancel cell model, specifically within the context of recurring prostate cancer, lends new perspectives to old dogmas. We demonstrate that UHPLC-MS/MS has enabled the analyses of novel metabolites of the enzymes, SRD5A, 11βHSD and 17βHSD, in LNCaP cells. Undoubtedly, the continuous advances in the analytical methodologies used for steroid profiling and quantification will give impetus to the unraveling of the remaining enigmas, old and new, of both hormone biosynthesis and metabolism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2015.04.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent advances in mass spectrometry-based analytical methodology have allowed for the identification and quantification of non-classical androgen metabolites.

    “In addition to the classical C19 steroids (DHEAS, DHEA, T and A4), recent advances in mass spectrometry-based analytical methodology have allowed for the identification and quantification of non-classical androgen metabolites (Bloem et al., 2015).”

    From Intracrine androgen biosynthesis, metabolism and action revisited (2018) · cites this paper as Bloem et al., 2015

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 69 · Cited by 52

Authors
Bloem, L. M., Storbeck, K.-H., Swart, P., du Toit, T., Schloms, L., & Swart, A. C.
Affiliations
Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Corresponding author
  • Swart, Pieter
  • Swart, Amanda C.
Venue
The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
153
Pages
80-92
ISSN
0960-0760 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093386301
Cited by
52
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • South African National Research Foundation (NRF)
  • Cancer Association of South Africa (CANSA)
  • South African Medical Research Council (MRC)
  • University of Stellenbosch
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Keywords
adrenal steroidogenesis, steroid profiling, LC-MS/MS, UPLC-MS/MS, GC-MS/MS, H295R cells, endocrine disruptors, congenital adrenal hyperplasia, polycystic ovary syndrome, 11β-hydroxyandrostenedione, LNCaP cells, steroid metabolites, prostate cancer
MeSH terms
Adrenal Glands, Animals, Chromatography, Gas, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Female, Humans, Male, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Prostatic Neoplasms, Steroids, Signal Transduction, 11-beta-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenases, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review