Assay reproducibility of serum androgen measurements using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry
Open accessAbstract
Background Valid and precise measures of androgen concentrations are needed for etiologic studies of hormonally-related cancers. We developed a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with two sample preparations to measure 11 androgens, including adrenal and gonadal androgenic precursors and their 5α-reduced metabolites.Methods Androgen levels were measured in serum from 20 healthy volunteers (5 men, 10 premenopausal women, 5 postmenopausal women). Two blinded, randomized aliquots per individual were assayed in each of three batches. A fourth batch of samples was measured at an external laboratory using comparable methodology to measure 9 of the 11 androgens. Coefficients of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated from the individual components of variance. Comparability of 9 androgens across laboratories was assessed using Spearman ranked correlations, Deming regression and bias plots.Results The laboratory CVs were <5% and ICCs were uniformly high (>95%) for all androgens measured across sex/menopausal status groups. Spearman ranked correlations for 9 hormones measured in the comparison laboratory were high (>0.85), suggesting good agreement.Conclusion Our high-performance LC-MS/MS assays of 11 androgens, including adrenal and gonadal androgenic precursors and their 5α-reduced metabolites demonstrated excellent laboratory reproducibility, and good comparability with an established method that measured 9 of the 11 hormones tested. The serum androgen metabolite assays are suitable for use in epidemiologic research.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In both men and women, ageing leads to decreases in C19 steroid production.
“In both men and women, ageing leads to decreases in C19 steroid production (Damgaard-Olesen et al., 2016, Haring et al., 2012, Trabert et al., 2016).”
From Intracrine androgen biosynthesis, metabolism and action revisited (2018) · cites this paper as Trabert et al., 2016
Women produce androgen metabolites in concentrations comparable to those of men.
“Importantly, women produce androgen metabolites in concentrations comparable to that of men (Labrie et al., 1997b, Trabert et al., 2016, Zang et al., 2017).”
From Intracrine androgen biosynthesis, metabolism and action revisited (2018) · cites this paper as Trabert et al., 2016
De-conjugation by β-glucuronidase is time-consuming and may lead to imprecision due to variability in hydrolysis efficiency.
“De-conjugation by β-glucuronidase is time-consuming and may lead to imprecision due to variability in hydrolysis efficiency (Trabert et al., 2016)”
From Intracrine androgen biosynthesis, metabolism and action revisited (2018) · cites this paper as Trabert et al., 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 21
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [17]Lunn G Hellwig LC Handbook of derivatization reaction for HPLC 1998 John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New Jersey
- Authors
- Trabert, B., Xu, X., Falk, R. T., Guillemette, C., Stanczyk, F. Z., & McGlynn, K. A.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (US)
- Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec (CA)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Trabert, Britton
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 155
- Issue
- Pt A
- Pages
- 56-62
- ISSN
- 0960-0760 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4663146
- OpenAlex
- W1802838310
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 1.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (ZIACP010126)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
- Keywords
- serum androgens, assay reproducibility, method validation, interlaboratory comparability, menopausal status, sex differences, LC-MS/MS assay
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Androgens, Chromatography, Liquid, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Premenopause, Postmenopause, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review