Cited by 70Second Language Acquisition and LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningLanguage Development and Disorders

Syntactic modification at early stages of L2 German writing development: A longitudinal learner corpus study.

Open access
Vyatkina, Nina, Hirschmann, Hagen, Golcher, Felix·2015·Journal of Second Language Writing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 89 · Cited by 70

Authors
Vyatkina, N., Hirschmann, H., & Golcher, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Vyatkina, Nina
Venue
Journal of Second Language Writing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
29
Pages
28-50
ISSN
1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W786155469
Cited by
70
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
FWCI
15.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Second Language Writing (publishedVersion)
  • KU ScholarWorks (The University of Kansas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
syntactic complexity, syntactic modification, interlanguage development, beginning learners, usage-based language acquisition, inflection, nonlinear development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review