CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 189EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningStudent Assessment and FeedbackWriting and Handwriting Education

Motivation and feedback: How implicit theories of intelligence predict L2 writers’ motivation and feedback orientation

Waller, Laurel, Papi, Mostafa·2017·Journal of Second Language Writing
DOI 10.1016/j.jslw.2017.01.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jslw.2017.01.004

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Aronson, 2002, Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 113, 10.1006/jesp.2001.1491 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bitchener, 2008, Evidence in support of written corrective feedback, Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102, 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Cardelle, 1981, Effects on second language learning of variations in written corrective feedback on homework assignments, TESOL Quarterly, 15, 251, 10.2307/3586751 · DOI
  4. Conway, 2003, A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research, Organizational Research Methods, 6, 147, 10.1177/1094428103251541 · DOI
  5. De Castella, 2015, My intelligence may be more malleable than yours: The revised implicit theories of intelligence (self-theory) scale is a better predictor of achievement, motivation, and student disengagement, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30, 245, 10.1007/s10212-015-0244-y · DOI
  6. Dweck, 1995, Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives, Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267, 10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1 · DOI
  7. Elliott, 1988, Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5, 10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.5 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Enginarlar, 1993, Student response to teacher feedback in EFL writing, System, 21, 193, 10.1016/0346-251X(93)90041-E · DOI
  9. Evans, 2010, Written corrective feedback: Practitioners’ perspectives, International Journal of English Studies, 10, 47, 10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119191 · DOI
  10. Ferris, 1995, Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms, TESOL Quarterly, 29, 33, 10.2307/3587804 · DOI
  11. Ferris, 2010, Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 181, 10.1017/S0272263109990490 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Ferris, 2013, Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers, Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 307, 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009 · DOI
  13. Grant, 2003, Clarifying achievement goals and their impact, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541, 10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.541 · DOI
  14. Hedgcock, 1994, Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing, Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 141, 10.1016/1060-3743(94)90012-4 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Hedgcock, 1996, Some input on input: Two analyses of student response to expert feedback in L2 writing, Modern Language Journal, 80, 287, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb01612.x · DOI
  16. Hendrickson, 1978, Error correction in foreign language teaching: Recent theory, research, and practice, Modern Language Journal, 62, 387
  17. Hyland, 1998, The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers, Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 255, 10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90017-0 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Jonsson, 2012, Teachers’ implicit theories of intelligence: Influences from different disciplines and scientific theories, European Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 387, 10.1080/02619768.2012.662636 · DOI
  19. Kormos, 2012, The role of individual differences in L2 writing, Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 390, 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.003 · DOI
  20. Lee, 2004, Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong, Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 285, 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.08.001 · DOI
  21. Leki, 1991, The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes, Foreign Language Annals, 24, 203, 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1991.tb00464.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. Mangels, 2006, Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1, 75, 10.1093/scan/nsl013 · DOI
  23. Montgomery, 2007, Teacher-written corrective feedback: Student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teacher performance, Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 82, 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.04.002 · DOI
  24. Papi, 2014, Language learner motivational types: A cluster analysis study, Language Learning, 64, 493, 10.1111/lang.12065 · DOI
  25. Radecki, 1988, ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work, System, 16, 355, 10.1016/0346-251X(88)90078-4 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Saito, 1994, Teachers’ practices and students’ preferences for feedback on second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners, TESL Canada Journal, 11, 46, 10.18806/tesl.v11i2.633 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Schulz, 1996, Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: Students’ and teachers’ views on error correction and the role of grammar, Foreign Language Annals, 29, 343, 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb01247.x · DOI
  28. Shao, 2015, On written corrective feedback in L2 writing, English Language Teaching, 8, 155, 10.5539/elt.v8n3p155 · DOI
  29. VandeWalle, 2003, A goal orientation model of feedback-seeking behavior, Human Resource Management Review, 13, 581, 10.1016/j.hrmr.2003.11.004 · DOI
  30. VandeWalle, 1997, A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 390, 10.1037/0021-9010.82.3.390 · DOI
  31. Zamel, 1985, Responding to student writing, TESOL Quarterly, 19, 79, 10.2307/3586773 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waller, L., & Papi, M.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Waller, Laurel
ORCID
Papi, Mostafa
Venue
Journal of Second Language Writing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
35
Pages
54-65
ISSN
1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jslw.2017.01.004
OpenAlex
W2589972988
Cited by
189
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5
FWCI
53.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Second Language Writing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
Keywords
implicit theories of intelligence, writing motivation, written corrective feedback, incremental theory, entity theory, second language writing, ESL writers, Dweck

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review