Cited by 121Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Maximizing the potential of early childhood education to prevent externalizing behavior problems: a meta-analysis

Schindler, Holly S., Kholoptseva, Jenya, Oh, Soojin S., Yoshikawa, Hirokazu, Duncan, Greg J., Magnuson, Katherine A., Shonkoff, Jack P.·2015·Journal of School Psychology

Abstract

Early childhood education (ECE) programs offer a promising mechanism for preventing early externalizing behavior problems and later antisocial behavior; yet, questions remain about how to best maximize ECE's potential. Using a meta-analytic database of 31 studies, we examined the overall effect of ECE on externalizing behavior problems and the differential effects of 3 levels of practice, each with increasing specificity and intensity aimed at children's social and emotional development. In short, we found that each successive level of programs did a better job than the prior level at reducing externalizing behavior problems. Level 1 programs, or those without a clear focus on social and emotional development, had no significant effects on externalizing behavior problems relative to control groups (ES=.13 SD, p<.10). On the other hand, level 2 programs, or those with a clear but broad focus on social and emotional development, were significantly associated with modest decreases in externalizing behavior problems relative to control groups (ES=-.10 SD, p<.05). Hence, level 2 programs were significantly better at reducing externalizing behavior problems than level 1 programs (ES=-.23 SD, p<.01). Level 3 programs, or those that more intensively targeted children's social and emotional development, were associated with additional significant reductions in externalizing behavior problems relative to level 2 programs (ES=-.26 SD, p<.05). The most promising effects came from level 3 child social skills training programs, which reduced externalizing behavior problems half of a standard deviation more than level 2 programs (ES=-.50 SD, p<.05).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsp.2015.04.001

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • UK home health interventions were associated with a cost of roughly $7,281 to $7,928 per quality-adjusted life year gained relative to routine care.

    “In the UK, home health interventions were associated with cost of ~$7,281 to $7,928 per quality-adjusted life year gained as compared with routine care.82,94”

    From Preventive strategies for mental health (2018) · cites this paper as [82]

  • Parent training produces cost savings after eight years and total savings over twenty-five years of at least $15,028 from public and societal perspectives.

    “Cost savings after 8 years and total savings over 25 years of at least $15,028 from public purse and societal perspective 82”

    From Preventive strategies for mental health (2018) · cites this paper as [82]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 88 · Cited by 121

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Achenbach, T. M. (1992). Manual for the child behavior checklist. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0022-4405(1500016-3/rf0005)
  2. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., &amp; Rothstein, H. (2005). Comprehensive meta-analysis, version 2. Englewood, NJ: Biostat. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0022-4405(1500016-3/rf0020)
  3. Clements, D. H. (2007). Curriculum research: Toward a framework for ' research-based curricula. ' . Journal for Research in Mathematics Education , 38 , 35 -70. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0022-4405(1500016-3/rf0075)
  4. Jacob, R. T., Creps, C. L., &amp; Boulay, B. (2004). Meta-analysis of research and evaluation studies in early childhood education. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates Inc. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0022-4405(1500016-3/rf0165)
  5. Losel, F., &amp; Bender, D. (2003). Resilience and protective factors. In D. P. Farrington, &amp; J. W. Coid (Eds.), Prevention of adult antisocial behavior . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Neuman, S. B., &amp; Cunningham, L. (2009). The impact of a practice-based approach to professional development: Coaching makes a difference. American Educational Research Journal , 46 , 532 -566.
  7. Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., &amp; Dishion, T. J. (1992). Antisocial boys: A social interactional approach. Eugene, OR: Castalia. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0022-4405(1500016-3/rf0265)
  8. Puma, M. J., Olsen, R. B., Bell, S. H., &amp; Price, C. (2009). What to do when data are missing in group randomized trials. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0022-4405(1500016-3/rf0280)
  9. Rosenshine, B. (2010). Researcher-developed tests and standardized tests: A review of ten meta-analyses. Paper presented at the Society of Research on Educational Effectiveness conference, Washington, DC .
  10. Schindler, H. S., &amp; Yoshikawa, H. (2012). Preventing crime in the preschool years. In D. P. Farrington, &amp; B. C. Welsh (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of crime prevention (pp. 70 -88). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Authors
Schindler, H. S., Kholoptseva, J., Oh, S. S., Yoshikawa, H., Duncan, G. J., Magnuson, K. A., & Shonkoff, J. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Schindler, Holly S.
Venue
Journal of School Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
243-263
ISSN
0022-4405 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1780738941
Cited by
121
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of School Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD073172)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
early childhood education, externalizing problems, antisocial behavior prevention, social-emotional development, program intensity, early intervention, preschool programs
MeSH terms
Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Humans, Early Intervention, Educational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review