Analytic bounds on causal risk differences in directed acyclic graphs involving three observed binary variables
Open accessAbstract
We apply a linear programming approach which uses the causal risk difference (RD(C)) as the objective function and provides minimum and maximum values that RD(C) can achieve under any set of linear constraints on the potential response type distribution. We consider two scenarios involving binary exposure X, covariate Z and outcome Y. In the first, Z is not affected by X, and is a potential confounder of the causal effect of X on Y. In the second, Z is affected by X and intermediate in the causal pathway between X and Y. For each scenario we consider various linear constraints corresponding to the presence or absence of arcs in the associated directed acyclic graph (DAG), monotonicity assumptions, and presence or absence of additive-scale interactions. We also estimate Z-stratum-specific bounds when Z is a potential effect measure modifier and bounds for both controlled and natural direct effects when Z is affected by X. In the absence of any additional constraints deriving from background knowledge, the well-known bounds on RDc are duplicated: -Pr(Y not equalX) </= RD(C) </= Pr(Y=X). These bounds have unit width, but can be narrowed by background knowledge-based assumptions. We provide and compare bounds and bound widths for various combinations of assumptions in the two scenarios and apply these bounds to real data from two studies.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Greenland derived analytic results and approximations for the relative size of endogenous selection bias and confounding bias in DAGs with binary variables.
“Greenland (2003), in particular, has derived useful analytic results and approximations for the relative size of endogenous selection bias and confounding bias in DAGs with binary variables (see also Kaufman et al. 2009).”
From Endogenous Selection Bias: The Problem of Conditioning on a Collider Variable (2014) · cites this paper as Kaufman et al. 2009
Section 2.2 describes analytic bounds for causal risk differences in DAGs with binary variables, supporting the general connection made by “see also Kaufman et al. 2009” (page unavailable). The paper does not report approximations comparing the relative size of endogenous selection bias and confounding bias; the searched passages address causal-effect bounds instead. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Instruments for Causal Inference: An Epidemiologist's Dream?
Hernán, M. A., & Robins, J. M. (2006) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/01.ede.0000222409.00878.37 · Cited by 961 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Balke AA 1995 Probabilistic Counterfactuals: Semantics, Computation, and Applications. Technical Report R-242, Cognitive Systems Laboratory Dept of Computer Science University of California Los Angeles Ph.D. dissertation
- Brookhart MA Wang PS Solomon DH Schneeweiss S 2006 Evaluating short-term drug effects using a physician-specific prescribing preference as an instrumental variable Epidemiology 17 268 75 16617275 PMC2715942
- Cole SR Hernán MA 2002 Fallibility in estimating direct effects Int J Epidem 31 163 5 11914314
- Costello EJ Compton SN Keeler G Angold A 2003 Relationships between poverty and psychopathology: a natural experiment JAMA 290 2023 9 14559956
- Flanders WD Khoury MJ 1990 Indirect assessment of confounding: Graphic description and limits on effect of adjusting for covariates Epidemiology 1 239 46 2081259
- Greenland S Robins JM 1986 Identifiability, exchangeability, and epidemiological confounding Int J Epidemiol 15 433 9 3771081
- Kaufman S Kaufman JS Maclehose RF Greenland S Poole C 2005 Improved estimation of controlled direct effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding of intermediate variables Stat Med 24 1683 702 15742358
- Lin DY Psaty BM Kronmal RA 1998 Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies Biometrics 54 948 63 9750244
- MacLehose RF Kaufman S Kauman JS Poole C 2005 Bounding causal effects under uncontrolled confounding using counterfactuals Epidemiology 16 548 55 15951674
- Manski C 1990 Nonparametric bounds on treatment effects American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 80 319 23
- Pearl J 2000 Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press
- Petersen ML Sinisi SE van der Laan MJ 2006 Estimation of direct causal effects Epidemiology 17 276 84 16617276
- Robins JM 2003 Semantics of causal DAG models and the identification of direct and indirect effects Green P Hjort NL Richardson S Highly Structured Stochastic Systems New York Oxford University Press 70 82
- Robins JM Greenland S 1992 Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects Epidemiology 3 143 55 1576220
- Rothman KJ Greenland S 1998 Basic methods for sensitivity analysis and external adjustment. Chapter 19 Rothman KJ Greenland S Modern epidemiology Second edition Philadelphia Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
- Sommer A Zeger SL 1991 On estimating efficacy from clinical-trials Stat Med 10 45 52 2006355
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Endogenous Selection Bias: The Problem of Conditioning on a Collider Variable
Elwert, F., & Winship, C. (2014) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043455 · Cited by 1,168 · see citing works
An Introduction to Causal Inference
Pearl, J. (2010) · The International Journal of Biostatistics · doi:10.2202/1557-4679.1203 · Cited by 755 · see citing works
Interpretation and identification of causal mediation
Pearl, J. (2014) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0036434 · Cited by 554 · see citing works
Experimental Designs for Identifying Causal Mechanisms
Imai, K., Tingley, D., & Yamamoto, T. (2013) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2012.01032.x · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Swanson, S. A., Hernán, M. A., Miller, M., Robins, J. M., & Richardson, T. S. (2018) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2018.1434530 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kaufman, S., Kaufman, J. S., & MacLehose, R. F.
- Affiliations
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- McGill University (CA)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kaufman, Sol
- Kaufman, Jay S.
- Venue
- Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3473-3487
- ISSN
- 0378-3758 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2739588
- OpenAlex
- W1982364633
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD039746)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Keywords
- directed acyclic graphs, linear programming bounds, binary exposure, controlled direct effect, natural direct effect, monotonicity assumption, prior knowledge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review