Evaluation of microalgae and cyanobacteria as potential sources of antimicrobial compounds
Open accessAbstract
In recent decades, marine microorganisms have become known for their ability to produce a wide variety of secondary bioactive metabolites. Several compounds have been isolated from marine microorganisms for the development of novel bioactives for the food and pharmaceutical industries. In this study, a number of microalgae were evaluated for their antimicrobial activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, including food and plant pathogens, using various extraction techniques and antimicrobial assays. Disc diffusion and spot-on-lawn assays were conducted to confirm the antimicrobial activity. To measure the potency of the extracts, minimum inhibition concentrations (MIultCs) were measured. Three microalgae, namely Isochrysis galbana, Scenedesmus sp. NT8c, and Chlorella sp. FN1, showed strong inhibitory activity preferentially against gram-positive bacteria. These microalgal species were then selected for further purification and analysis, leading to compound identification. By using a mixture of different chromatography techniques gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS), we were able to separate and identify the dominant compounds that are responsible for the inhibitory activity. Additionally, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) was used to confirm the presence of these compounds. The dominant compounds that were identified and purified in the extracts are linoleic acid, oleic acid, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA). These compounds are the potential candidates that inhibit the growth of gram-positive bacteria. This indicates the potential use of microalgae and their antimicrobial compounds as biocontrol agents against food and plant pathogens.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Alsenani et al. stated that extracts of three microalgae species exhibited strong antimicrobial activities against gram-positive bacteria, while no inhibition was observed with gram-negative bacteria.
“Alsenani et al. [192] stated that extracts of three microalgae species exhibited strong antimicrobial activities against gram-positive bacteria, while no inhibition was observed with gram-negative bacteria.”
From Microalgae-based wastewater treatment: Mechanisms, challenges, recent advances, and future prospects (2023) · cites this paper as [192]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 149
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- O’Neill, J., 2016. Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: final report and recommendations, Review on antimicrobial resistance.
- Authors
- Alsenani, F., Tupally, K. R., Chua, E. T., Eltanahy, E., Alsufyani, H., Parekh, H. S., & Schenk, P. M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Mansoura University (EG)
- University of Jeddah (SA)
- Corresponding author
- Alsenani, Faisal
- ORCID
- Venue
- Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1834-1841
- ISSN
- 1319-0164 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7783216
- OpenAlex
- W3109455633
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 11
- FWCI
- 13.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Keywords
- microalgae, cyanobacteria, antimicrobial agents, marine microorganisms, secondary metabolites, Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, foodborne pathogens, plant pathogens, Isochrysis galbana, Scenedesmus, Chlorella, minimum inhibitory concentration, linoleic acid, oleic acid, docosahexaenoic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid, omega-3 fatty acids, biological control agents, natural product isolation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review