Cited by 138Traffic control and managementTraffic and Road SafetyHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

Stability and safety evaluation of mixed traffic flow with connected automated vehicles on expressways

Yao, Zhihong, Hu, Rong, Jiang, Yangsheng, Xu, Taorang·2020·Journal of Safety Research

Abstract

Introduction Connected automated vehicles (CAVs) technology has deeply integrated advanced technologies in various fields, providing an effective way to improve traffic safety. However, it would take time for vehicles on the road to vehicles from human-driven vehicles (HDVs) progress to CAVs. Moreover, the Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) vehicle would degrade into the Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) vehicle due to communication failure. Method First, the different car-following models are used to capture characteristics of different types of vehicles (e.g., HDVs, CACC, and ACC). Second, the stability of mixed traffic flow is analyzed under different penetration rates of CAVs. Then, multiple safety measures, such as standard deviation of vehicle speed (SD), time exposed rear-end crash risk (TER), time exposed time-to-collision (TET), and time-integrated time-to-collision (TIT) are used to evaluate the safety of mixed traffic flow on expressways. Finally, the sensitivity of traffic demand, the threshold of time-to-collision (TTC), and the parameters of car-following models are analyzed based on a numerical simulation. Results The results show that the ACC vehicle has no significant impact on the SD of mixed traffic flows, but it leads to the deterioration of TET and TIT, making the reduction proportion of TER slower. When the penetration rate exceeds 50%, the increase of CACC vehicles reduces traffic safety risks significantly. Furthermore, the increase in traffic dema…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.09.012

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yao, Z., Hu, R., Jiang, Y., & Xu, T.
Affiliations
Southwest Jiaotong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yao, Zhihong
Venue
Journal of Safety Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
75
Pages
262-274
ISSN
0022-4375 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3098253819
Cited by
138
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 12
FWCI
7.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Safety Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (52002339, 71771190, 71901183)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords
connected and automated vehicles, mixed traffic, traffic flow stability, road safety, cooperative adaptive cruise control, adaptive cruise control, car-following model, CAV penetration rate, communication breakdown, time-to-collision, motorways
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Automobile Driving, China, Computer Simulation, Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review