Cited by 27Trauma and Emergency Care StudiesGun Ownership and Violence ResearchInjury Epidemiology and Prevention

Pediatric trauma recidivism in an urban cohort

Davis, James S., Pandya, Reeni K., Sola, Juan E., Perez, Eduardo A., Neville, Holly L., Schulman, Carl I.·2013·Journal of Surgical Research

Abstract

Background Recidivism is a well-known problem in adult trauma patients. Trauma recidivists are a population that warrants further intervention to prevent future trauma. Among pediatric patients, the recidivism rate, demographics, mechanism, and mortality are unknown. We hypothesized that specific groups of pediatric trauma recidivists could be identified for targeted prevention efforts. Methods All pediatric trauma patients admitted to a level 1 pediatric trauma center in an urban county hospital between 1991 and 2010 were reviewed. Age, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale, injury location, injury cause, disposition, length of stay, and mortality were collected and compared between nonrecidivist and recidivist cohorts. Results The recidivism rate among patients aged 0-19 y was 1.5% compared with 0.9% in those aged 0-16 y. Recidivists were more likely males (P Conclusions The pediatric recidivism rate in our population is small. Nevertheless, recidivists are more than twice as likely to be injured by penetrating trauma, especially GSWs. Targeted screening and counseling in this demographic may be helpful in reducing youth trauma recidivism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jss.2012.12.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The comprehensive and representative sample may account for the higher recurrent injury observed in this study compared to others reporting recurrent firearm injury ranging from one to 10% across a variety of clinical and geographic settings and time periods.

    “This may account for the higher recurrent injury observed in this study compared to others reporting recurrent firearm injury ranging from one to 10% across a variety of clinical and geographic settings and time periods.15,18,33-44”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, J. S., Pandya, R. K., Sola, J. E., Perez, E. A., Neville, H. L., & Schulman, C. I.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Venue
Journal of Surgical Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
182
Issue
2
Pages
326-330
ISSN
0022-4804 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097279373
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 4
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Surgical Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
Keywords
pediatric trauma, trauma recidivism, gunshot wounds, penetrating trauma, injury prevention, trauma mortality, injury mechanisms
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Retrospective Studies, Wounds and Injuries, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review