Cited by 33Advanced Software Engineering MethodologiesSoftware Engineering Techniques and PracticesModel-Driven Software Engineering Techniques

Software architecture review by association

Tang, Antony, Lau, Man F.·2014·Journal of Systems and Software

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jss.2013.09.044

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is complex for practitioners to comprehend the scopes and impacts of architectural changes.

    “It is complex for practitioners to comprehend the scopes and impacts of architectural changes [95, 103].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tang, A., & Lau, M. F.
Affiliations
Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Tang, Antony
Venue
Journal of Systems and Software
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
88
Pages
87-101
ISSN
0164-1212 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035074191
Cited by
33
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Systems and Software (publishedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
Keywords
design reasoning, design challenges, software component selection, design gap

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review