Decision making in software architecture
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An example of pragmatism, creating a minimum viable product in a short amount of time, is noted in prior research and recounted by some participants.
“An example of pragmatism, creating a minimum viable product in a short amount of time, is noted in prior research [46, 100], which is also recounted by some participants (P3b, P3g, P5a, P6a).”
From Software Architecture in Practice: Challenges and Opportunities (2023) · cites this paper as [100]
Technical debt is a metaphor reflecting technical compromises that yield short-term benefits but hurt long-term success of software systems.
“Technical debt is a metaphor reflecting technical compromises that yield short-term benefits but hurt the long-term success of software systems [100].”
From Software Architecture in Practice: Challenges and Opportunities (2023) · cites this paper as [100]
Cites
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01405730 · Cited by 16,338 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Large-Scale Survey on the Usability of AI Programming Assistants: Successes and Challenges
Liang, J. T., Yang, C., & Myers, B. A. (2024) · Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3597503.3608128 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Insolvent: How to Reorient Computing for Just Sustainability
Becker, C. (2023) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/14668.001.0001 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Software Architecture in Practice: Challenges and Opportunities
Wan, Z., Zhang, Y., Xia, X., Jiang, Y., & Lo, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the 31st ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3611643.3616367 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- van Vliet, H., & Tang, A.
- Affiliations
- Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
- ORCID
- Tang, Antony
- Venue
- Journal of Systems and Software
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 117
- Pages
- 638-644
- ISSN
- 0164-1212 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2278734688
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 9.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Systems and Software (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
- Keywords
- software architecture, design decisions, decision-making, software architects, design rationale
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
