A systematic mapping study on architectural smells detection
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lack of tool support for detecting architectural smells.
“Lack of tool support for detecting architectural smells ( cogs ).”
From Software Architecture in Practice: Challenges and Opportunities (2023) · cites this paper as [70]
Cites
Wohlin, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2601248.2601268 · Cited by 4,234 · cited 4× · see citing works
“3.4 Snowballing We used the guidelines of Wohlin [51] to perform snowball sampling to search the relevant literature that might have been missed by our search string.”
MethodInfluentialSystematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering
Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., & Mattsson, M. (2008) · Electronic Workshops in Computing · doi:10.14236/ewic/ease2008.8 · Cited by 3,239 · cited 1× · see citing works
“[38, 39] and driven by our research questions.”
Are code smell detection tools suitable for detecting architecture degradation?
Lenhard, J., Hassan, M. M., Blom, M., & Herold, S. (2017) · Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Software Architecture: Companion Proceedings · doi:10.1145/3129790.3129808 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Software Architecture in Practice: Challenges and Opportunities
Wan, Z., Zhang, Y., Xia, X., Jiang, Y., & Lo, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the 31st ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3611643.3616367 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“Architectural smells indicate the structural problems in the components and their interactions with other components of software systems that are caused by architecture antipatterns, misuse or violation of architecture styles, and violation of design principles [68].”
Background
- Authors
- Mumtaz, H., Singh, P., & Blincoe, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Mumtaz, Haris
- Venue
- Journal of Systems and Software
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 173
- Pages
- 110885
- ISSN
- 0164-1212 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3111031598
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 5.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Systems and Software (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
- Keywords
- architectural smells, software architecture, architectural style, service-oriented architecture, cloud architecture, software quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
