Cited by 64Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryCardiac Health and Mental HealthCancer survivorship and care

Self-Efficacy, Poststroke Depression, and Rehabilitation Outcomes: Is There a Correlation?

Torrisi, Michele, De Cola, Maria Cristina, Buda, Antonio, Carioti, Luigi, Scaltrito, Maria Valentina, Bramanti, Placido, Manuli, Alfredo, De Luca, Rosaria +1 more·2018·Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases

Abstract

Background The sudden live changes of stroke survivors may lead to negative psychological and behavioral outcomes, including anxiety and depressive mood, which may compromise the rehabilitation process. Some personality features, such as self-efficacy, could play an important role in mediating the degree of post-stroke depression. Aim of this study is to investigate the possible correlation between specific psychological dimensions, such as poststroke depression and self-efficacy, and rehabilitation outcomes.Materials and methods Thirty-eight patients, affected by stroke, completed a four-hour-daily training lasting up to 8 weeks, including traditional and robotic-assisted physiotherapy. Patients were assessed at admission (T0) and at the end (T1) of the motor training, by means of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale, the General Self-Efficacy Scale, and the Functional Independent Measure.Results We observed a significant T0-T1 difference in MADRS scores in patients with a better functional recovery (t = 5.76; P < .0001) and higher self-efficacy (t = 4.74; P < .001), but no significant T0-T1 difference in individuals without functional recovery (t = 1.21; P = .239) and low self-efficacy (t = 1.72; P = .103).Conclusions Our study shows that rehabilitation outcomes and self-efficacy may influence mood, but not vice versa. Thus, to potentiate self-efficacy in the rehabilitation setting may help clinicians in obtaining better functional outcomes, including depression reduction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.07.021

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 64

Authors
Torrisi, M., De Cola, M. C., Buda, A., Carioti, L., Scaltrito, M. V., Bramanti, P., Manuli, A., De Luca, R., & Calabrò, R. S.
Affiliations
Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo (IT)
Corresponding author
Calabrò, Rocco Salvatore
Venue
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
27
Issue
11
Pages
3208-3211
ISSN
1052-3057 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2886233658
Cited by
64
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
self-efficacy, post-stroke depression, stroke rehabilitation, functional recovery, motor training, depression reduction, psychological factors in rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Affect, Aged, Depression, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Robotics, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Recovery of Function, Self Efficacy, Stroke, Physical Therapy Modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review