The Glass Houses of Attending Surgeons: An Assessment of Unprofessional Behavior on Facebook Among Practicing Surgeons
Abstract
Purpose Our recent publication demonstrated that unprofessional behavior on Facebook is common among surgical residents. In the formulation of standards and curricula to address this issue, it is important that surgical faculty lead by example. Our current study refocuses on the Facebook profiles of faculty surgeons involved in the education of general surgery residents.Methods The American College of Surgeons (ACS) web site was used to identify general surgery residencies located in the Midwest. Departmental web sites were then searched to identify teaching faculty for the general surgery residency. Facebook was then searched to determine which faculty had profiles available for viewing by the general public. Profiles were then placed in 1 of the 3 following categories: professional, potentially unprofessional, or clearly unprofessional.Statistical analysis A chi-square test was used to determine significance.Results In all, 57 residency programs were identified on the ACS web site, 100% of which provided an institutional web site listing the surgical faculty. A total of 758 general surgery faculty were identified (133 women and 625 men), of which 195 (25.7%) had identifiable Facebook accounts. In all, 165 faculty (84.6%) had no unprofessional content, 20 (10.3%) had potentially unprofessional content, and 10 (5.1%) had clearly unprofessional content. Inter-rater reliability was good (88.9% agreement, κ = 0.784). Clearly unprofessional behavior was found only in male surgeons. For male surgeons, clearly unprofessional behavior was more common among those in practice for less than 5 years (p = 0.031). Alcohol and politics were the most commonly found variables in the potentially unprofessional group. Inappropriate language and sexually suggestive material were the most commonly found variables in the clearly unprofessional group.Conclusions Unprofessional behavior on Facebook is less common among surgical faculty compared with surgical residents. However, the rates remain unacceptably high, especially among men and those in practice for less than 5 years. Education on the dangers of social media should not be limited to residents but should instead be extended to attending surgeons as well.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among attending surgeons, 10.3% had potentially unprofessional content, and 5.1% had clearly unprofessional content.
“Among attending surgeons, 10.3% had potentially unprofessional content, and 5.1% had clearly unprofessional content.”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [87]
A similar comparison among surgical residents and practicing surgeons showed a decreasing percentage of unprofessional content among attending surgeons.
“A similar comparison was made among surgical residents and practicing surgeons with a decreasing percentage of unprofessional content among attending surgeons [86,87].”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [87]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 6 · Cited by 33
- Authors
- Langenfeld, S. J., Sudbeck, C., Luers, T., Adamson, P., Cook, G., & Schenarts, P. J.
- Affiliations
- Nebraska Medical Center (US)
- University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Langenfeld, Sean J.
- Venue
- Journal of Surgical Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e280-e285
- ISSN
- 1878-7452 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-7204
- OpenAlex
- W1144169095
- Semantic Scholar
- e1403263c5b85ccfe8fac971beb9906063834bcd
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 7.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of surgical education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Keywords
- unprofessional behavior, Facebook, social media, attending surgeons, surgical faculty, general surgery residency, professional conduct, surgeon gender, social media in education
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Internship and Residency, Male, Medical Staff, Hospital, General Surgery, Professional Misconduct, Social Media, Surgeons
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review