Cited by 49Vibration Control and Rheological FluidsHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsDynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Variable friction device for structural control based on duo-servo vehicle brake: Modeling and experimental validation

Cao, Liang, Downey, Austin, Laflamme, Simon, Taylor, Douglas, Ricles, James·2015·Journal of Sound and Vibration

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsv.2015.03.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cao et al. proposed a semi-active variable friction damper based on the duo-servo drum brake technology of vehicles, and fabricated a scaled-down prototype to characterize its dynamic performance.

    “Cao et al. [94] proposed a semi-active VFD based on the duo-servo drum brake technology of vehicles. To evaluate the damper, they fabricated a scaled-down prototype and characterized its dynamic performance.”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Symans, 2008, Energy dissipation systems for seismic applications: current practice and recent developments, Journal of Structural Engineering, 134, 3, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:1(3) · DOI
  2. Mualla, 2002, Performance of steel frames with a new friction damper device under earthquake excitation, Engineering Structures, 24, 365, 10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00102-X · DOI
  3. Pall, 1980, Friction joints for seismic control of large panel structures, Journal Prestressed Concrete Institute, 25, 38
  4. Pall, 1982, Response of friction damped braced frames, Journal of Structural Engineering, 108, 1313
  5. Filiatrault, 1987, Performance evaluation of friction damped braced steel frames under simulated earthquake loads, Earthquake Spectra, 3, 57, 10.1193/1.1585419 · DOI
  6. FitzGerald, 1989, Slotted bolted connections in aseismic design for concentrically braced connections, Earthquake Spectra, 5, 383, 10.1193/1.1585528 · DOI
  7. Grigorian, 1993, Slotted bolted connection energy dissipators, Earthquake Spectra, 9, 491, 10.1193/1.1585726 · DOI
  8. Morgen, 2004, A friction damper for post-tensioned precast concrete beam-to-column joints, Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute Journal, 49, 112
  9. Lin, 2012, Seismic performance of a large-scale steel self-centering moment-resisting frame, Journal of Structural Engineering, 139, 1227, 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000661 · DOI
  10. Panchal, 2008, Variable friction pendulum system for near-fault ground motions, Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 15, 568, 10.1002/stc.216 · DOI
  11. Mirtaheri, 2011, Numerical and experimental study of hysteretic behavior of cylindrical friction dampers, Engineering Structures, 33, 3647, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.07.029 · DOI
  12. Kannan, 1995, Active control of building seismic response by energy dissipation, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 24, 747, 10.1002/eqe.4290240510 · DOI
  13. Vesselenyi, 2007, Fuzzy and neural controllers for a pneumatic actuator, International Journal of Computers Communications and Control, 2, 375, 10.15837/ijccc.2007.4.2368 · DOI
  14. Mehmood, 2011, Modeling identification and simulation of pneumatic actuator for vgt system, Sensors and Actuators A, 165, 367, 10.1016/j.sna.2010.11.006 · DOI
  15. Yang, 2002, Semi-active hybrid control systems for nonlinear buildings against near-field earthquakes, Engineering Structures, 24, 271, 10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00094-3 · DOI
  16. Lorenz, 2006, A novel engine mount with semi-active dry friction damping, Shock and Vibration, 13, 559, 10.1155/2006/263251 · DOI
  17. Narasimhan, 2006, Smart base isolated buildings with variable friction systems, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35, 921, 10.1002/eqe.559 · DOI
  18. Kawamoto, 2008, Electro-mechanical suspension system considering energy consumption and vehicle manoeuvre, Vehicle System Dynamics, 46, 1053, 10.1080/00423110802056263 · DOI
  19. Chen, 2004, Shake table tests of a quarter-scale three-storey building model with piezoelectric friction dampers, Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 11, 239, 10.1002/stc.41 · DOI
  20. Lu, 2009, A theoretical study on piezoelectric smart isolation system for seismic protection of equipment in near-fault areas, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 20, 217, 10.1177/1045389X08091120 · DOI
  21. O. Durmaz, W.W. Clark, D.S. Bennett, J.S. Paine, M.N. Samuelson, Experimental and analytical studies of a novel semi-active piezoelectric coulomb damper, In: SPIE׳s 9th Annual International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2002, pp. 258–273. · DOI
  22. Xu, 2008, Seismic protection of a building complex using variable friction damper: experimental investigation, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 134, 637, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2008)134:8(637) · DOI
  23. Dai, 2012, Structural passive control on electromagnetic friction energy dissipation device, Thin-Walled Structures, 58, 1, 10.1016/j.tws.2012.03.017 · DOI
  24. Agrawal, 2000, Semiactive Control Strategies for Buildings Subject to Near Field Earthquakes, 359
  25. Laflamme, 2012, Modified friction device for control of large-scale systems, Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 19, 548, 10.1002/stc.454 · DOI
  26. D.P. Taylor, Toggle brace dampers: a new concept for structural control, Proceedings of the 2000 Structures Congress and Exposition on Advanced Technology in Structural Engineering, 2000. · DOI
  27. C. Huang, R. McNamara, The efficiency of the motion amplification device with viscous damper, 8th National Conference for Earthquake Engineering, vol. 62, 2006.
  28. Constantinou, 2001, Toggle-brace-damper seismic energy dissipation systems, Journal of Structural Engineering, 127, 105, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:2(105) · DOI
  29. Laflamme, 2011, Wavelet network for semi-active control, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 137, 462, 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000248 · DOI
  30. Olsson, 1998, Friction models and friction compensation, European Journal of Control, 4, 176, 10.1016/S0947-3580(98)70113-X · DOI
  31. Jiménez, 2005, Lugre friction model for a magnetorheological damper, Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 12, 91, 10.1002/stc.58 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cao, L., Downey, A., Laflamme, S., Taylor, D., & Ricles, J.
Affiliations
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • Lehigh University (US)
Corresponding author
Cao, Liang
Venue
Journal of Sound and Vibration
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
348
Pages
41-56
ISSN
0022-460X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970009031
Cited by
49
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5
FWCI
9.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sound and Vibration (publishedVersion)
  • Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1300960)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
Keywords
semi-active vibration control, structural vibration reduction, friction modeling, LuGre friction model, hydraulic pressure, earthquake response, passive damping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review