Cited by 96Vibration Control and Rheological FluidsVibration and Dynamic AnalysisAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Nonlinear isolation of transverse vibration of pre-pressure beams

Ding, Hu, Lu, Ze-Qi, Chen, Li-Qun·2019·Journal of Sound and Vibration

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsv.2018.11.028

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The quasi-zero stiffness system has a good vibration isolation performance on the transverse vibration of elastic beams.

    “The research showed that the quasi-zero stiffness system has a good vibration isolation performance on the transverse vibration of elastic beams [103,105] .”
  • The axial pressure at both ends of the elastic continuum could significantly improve the vibration isolation performance.

    “Moreover, the axial pressure at both ends of the elastic continuum could significantly improve the vibration isolation performance.”
  • The quasi-zero stiffness system has superior isolation performance over linear isolators for multimodal resonance of an elastic continuum.

    “The results showed that the quasi-zero stiffness system has superior isolation performance over linear isolators for multimodal resonance of an elastic continuum.”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. Stancioiu, 2016, Optimal vibration control of beams subjected to a mass moving at constant speed, J. Vib. Contr., 22, 3202, 10.1177/1077546314561814 · DOI
  2. Kang, 1996, Modal properties of beams and plates on resilient supports with rotational and translational complex stiffness, J. Sound Vib., 190, 207, 10.1006/jsvi.1996.0057 · DOI
  3. Dai, 2018, Post-capture vibration suppression of spacecraft via a bio-inspired isolation system, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 105, 214, 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.12.015 · DOI
  4. Elishakoff, 1995, Random vibration of uniform beams with varying boundary-conditions by the dynamic-edge-effect method, Comput. Methods Appl. Math., 121, 59
  5. Fan, 1998, The forced vibration of a beam with viscoelastic boundary supports, J. Sound Vib., 210, 673, 10.1006/jsvi.1997.1353 · DOI
  6. Lee, 1998, Non-uniform Timoshenko beams with time-dependent elastic boundary conditions, J. Sound Vib., 217, 223, 10.1006/jsvi.1998.1747 · DOI
  7. Lin, 2000, The closed-form solution for the forced vibration of non-uniform plates with distributed time-dependent boundary conditions, J. Sound Vib., 232, 493, 10.1006/jsvi.1999.2750 · DOI
  8. Baeza, 2011, A railway track dynamics model based on modal substructuring and a cyclic boundary condition, J. Sound Vib., 330, 75, 10.1016/j.jsv.2010.07.023 · DOI
  9. Kim, 2001, Vibration of beams with generally restrained boundary conditions using Fourier series, J. Sound Vib., 245, 771, 10.1006/jsvi.2001.3615 · DOI
  10. Grossi, 2008, The transition conditions in the dynamics of elastically restrained beams, J. Sound Vib., 316, 274, 10.1016/j.jsv.2008.02.019 · DOI
  11. Xing, 2013, Free vibrations of a beam with elastic end restraints subject to a constant axial load, Arch. Appl. Mech., 83, 241, 10.1007/s00419-012-0649-x · DOI
  12. Wattanasakulpong, 2016, Adomian-modified decomposition method for large-amplitude vibration analysis of stepped beams with elastic boundary conditions, Mech. Based Des. Struct., 44, 270, 10.1080/15397734.2015.1055762 · DOI
  13. Jin, 2011, Stability and natural characteristics of a supported beam, Product Des. Manuf., 338, 467
  14. Lv, 2015, Moving force-induced vibration of a rotating beam with elastic boundary conditions, Int. J. Struct. Stabil. Dynam., 15, 1450035, 10.1142/S0219455414500357 · DOI
  15. Zhang, 2016, Nonlinear dynamics of straight fluid-conveying pipes with general boundary conditions and additional springs and masses, Appl. Math. Model., 40, 7880, 10.1016/j.apm.2016.03.050 · DOI
  16. Mao, 2017, Vibration of flexible structures under nonlinear boundary conditions, J. Appl. Mech., 84, 111006, 10.1115/1.4037883 · DOI
  17. Ding, 2018, Free and forced nonlinear vibration of a transporting belt with pulley support ends, Nonlinear Dynam., 92, 2037, 10.1007/s11071-018-4179-0 · DOI
  18. Yao, 2012, Multi-pulse chaotic dynamics in non-planar motion of parametrically excited viscoelastic moving belt, J. Sound Vib., 331, 2624, 10.1016/j.jsv.2012.01.027 · DOI
  19. Chen, 2010, Nonlinear dynamics of higher-dimensional system for an axially accelerating viscoelastic beam with in-plane and out-of-plane vibrations, J. Sound Vib., 329, 5321, 10.1016/j.jsv.2010.06.023 · DOI
  20. Ding, 2018, Nonlinear vibration of a traveling belt with non-homogeneous boundaries, J. Sound Vib., 424, 78, 10.1016/j.jsv.2018.03.010 · DOI
  21. Hoque, 2012, A modified zero-power control and its application to vibration isolation system, J. Vib. Contr., 18, 1788, 10.1177/1077546311419985 · DOI
  22. Zhang, 2017, Forced vibration control of an axially moving beam with an attached nonlinear energy sink, Acta Mech. Solida Sin., 30, 674, 10.1016/j.camss.2017.09.004 · DOI
  23. Chen, 2017, Vibration suppression for truss core sandwich beam based on principle of nonlinear targeted energy transfer, Compos. Struct., 171, 419, 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.030 · DOI
  24. Chen, 2018, Vibration suppression and higher branch responses of beam with parallel nonlinear energy sinks, Nonlinear Dynam., 91, 885, 10.1007/s11071-017-3917-z · DOI
  25. Wong, 2007, Design of a dynamic vibration absorber for vibration isolation of beams under point or distributed loading, J. Sound Vib., 301, 898, 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.10.028 · DOI
  26. Sachdeva, 2018, Seismic response control of a structure isolated by flat sliding bearing and nonlinear restoring spring: experimental study for performance evaluation, Eng. Struct., 159, 1, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.12.033 · DOI
  27. Ibrahim, 2008, Recent advances in nonlinear passive vibration isolators, J. Sound Vib., 314, 371, 10.1016/j.jsv.2008.01.014 · DOI
  28. Yang, 2018, Delay-controlled primary and stochastic resonances of the SD oscillator with stiffness nonlinearities, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 103, 216, 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.10.002 · DOI
  29. Wang, 2017, Enhancing the isolation performance by a nonlinear secondary spring in the Zener model, Nonlinear Dynam., 87, 2483, 10.1007/s11071-016-3205-3 · DOI
  30. Yan, 2018, Shock isolation performance of a geometric anti-spring isolator, J. Sound Vib., 413, 120, 10.1016/j.jsv.2017.10.024 · DOI
  31. Lang, 2009, Theoretical study of the effects of nonlinear viscous damping on vibration isolation of SDOF systems, J. Sound Vib., 323, 352, 10.1016/j.jsv.2009.01.001 · DOI
  32. Guo, 2012, Analysis and design of the force and displacement transmissibility of nonlinear viscous damper based vibration isolation systems, Nonlinear Dynam., 67, 2671, 10.1007/s11071-011-0180-6 · DOI
  33. Peng, 2012, Study of the effects of cubic nonlinear damping on vibration isolations using Harmonic balance method, Int. J. Nonlinear Mech., 47, 1073, 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2011.09.013 · DOI
  34. Huang, 2016, The isolation performance of vibration systems with general velocity-displacement-dependent nonlinear damping under base excitation: numerical and experimental study, Nonlinear Dynam., 85, 777, 10.1007/s11071-016-2722-4 · DOI
  35. Sun, 2014, Vibration isolation via a scissor-like structured platform, J. Sound Vib., 333, 2404, 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.12.025 · DOI
  36. Zhang, 2016, Analysis on nonlinear stiffness and vibration isolation performance of scissor-like structure with full types, Nonlinear Dynam., 86, 17, 10.1007/s11071-016-2869-z · DOI
  37. Zhang, 2015, Dynamic features of passive whole-spacecraft vibration isolation platform based on non-probabilistic reliability, J. Vib. Contr., 21, 60, 10.1177/1077546313486277 · DOI
  38. Shen, 2015, Design of single degree-of-freedom optimally passive vibration isolation system, J. Vib. Eng. Technol., 3, 25
  39. Xu, 2016, Vibration suppression on a platform by using vibration isolation and mitigation devices, Nonlinear Dynam., 83, 1341, 10.1007/s11071-015-2407-4 · DOI
  40. Jiang, 2017, The vibration transmissibility of a single degree of freedom oscillator with nonlinear fractional order damping, Int. J. Syst. Sci., 48, 2379, 10.1080/00207721.2017.1316530 · DOI
  41. Liu, 2015, Recent advances in micro-vibration isolation, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 56–57, 55, 10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.10.007 · DOI
  42. Robertson, 2009, Theoretical design parameters for a quasi-zero stiffness magnetic spring for vibration isolation, J. Sound Vib., 326, 88, 10.1016/j.jsv.2009.04.015 · DOI
  43. Hao, 2017, Nonlinear dynamics of the quasi-zero-stiffness SD oscillator based upon the local and global bifurcation analyses, Nonlinear Dynam., 87, 987, 10.1007/s11071-016-3093-6 · DOI
  44. Cheng, 2018, Resonance of a quasi-zero stiffness vibration system under base excitation with load mismatch, Int. J. Struct. Stabil. Dynam., 18, 1850002, 10.1142/S0219455418500025 · DOI
  45. Zheng, 2018, Analytical study of a quasi-zero stiffness coupling using a torsion magnetic spring with negative stiffness, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 100, 135, 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.07.028 · DOI
  46. Platus, 1992, Negative stiffness-mechanism vibration isolation systems, Vib. Contr. Microelectron., Opt. Metrol., 1619, 44, 10.1117/12.56823 · DOI
  47. Le, 2016, Improvement of vibration isolation performance of isolation system using negative stiffness structure, Ieee-Asme T Mech., 21, 1561, 10.1109/TMECH.2015.2506701 · DOI
  48. Dai, 2018, Post-capture vibration suppression of spacecraft via a bio-inspired isolation system, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 105, 214, 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.12.015 · DOI
  49. Huang, 2014, Vibration isolation characteristics of a nonlinear isolator using Euler buckled beam as negative stiffness corrector: a theoretical and experimental study, J. Sound Vib., 333, 1132, 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.10.026 · DOI
  50. Fulcher, 2014, Analytical and experimental investigation of buckled beams as negative stiffness elements for passive vibration and shock isolation systems, J. Vib. Acoust., 136, 031009, 10.1115/1.4026888 · DOI
  51. Palomares, 2018, Numerical and experimental analysis of a vibration isolator equipped with a negative stiffness system, J. Sound Vib., 414, 31, 10.1016/j.jsv.2017.11.006 · DOI
  52. Lu, 2016, Stochastic resonance in a nonlinear mechanical vibration isolation system, J. Sound Vib., 370, 221, 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.01.042 · DOI
  53. Cheng, 2017, Force and displacement transmissibility of a quasi-zero stiffness vibration isolator with geometric nonlinear damping, Nonlinear Dynam., 87, 2267, 10.1007/s11071-016-3188-0 · DOI
  54. Li, 2017, Vibration attenuation of high dimensional quasi-zero stiffness floating raft system, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 126, 186, 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.03.029 · DOI
  55. Wang, 2017, Force transmissibility of a two-stage vibration isolation system with quasi-zero stiffness, Nonlinear Dynam., 87, 633, 10.1007/s11071-016-3065-x · DOI
  56. Wang, 2017, Comparison of the dynamic performance of nonlinear one and two degree-of-freedom vibration isolators with quasi-zero stiffness, Nonlinear Dynam., 88, 635, 10.1007/s11071-016-3266-3 · DOI
  57. Liu, 2016, Band stop vibration suppression using a passive X-shape structured lever-type isolation system, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 68–69, 342, 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.07.018 · DOI
  58. Liu, 2015, Vibration isolation using a hybrid lever-type isolation system with an X-shape supporting structure, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 98, 169, 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.04.012 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Ding, 2018, Transmissibility of bending vibration of an elastic beam, J. Vib. Acoust., 140, 031007, 10.1115/1.4038733 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Ding, 2018, Nonlinear vibration isolation of a viscoelastic beam, Nonlinear Dynam., 92, 325, 10.1007/s11071-018-4058-8 · DOI
  61. Yao, 2015, Nonlinear vibrations and chaotic dynamics of the laminated composite piezoelectric beam, J. Vib. Acoust., 137, 011002, 10.1115/1.4028710 · DOI
  62. Yao, 2012, Multi-pulse chaotic dynamics in non-planar motion of parametrically excited viscoelastic moving belt, J. Sound Vib., 331, 2624, 10.1016/j.jsv.2012.01.027 · DOI
  63. Zhang, 2005, Chaotic motion and its control for nonlinear nonplanar oscillations of a parametrically excited cantilever beam, Chaos, Solit. Fractals, 26, 731, 10.1016/j.chaos.2005.01.042 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ding, H., Lu, Z.-Q., & Chen, L.-Q.
Affiliations
Shanghai University (CN)
Corresponding author
Ding, Hu
Venue
Journal of Sound and Vibration
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
442
Pages
738-751
ISSN
0022-460X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901973306
Cited by
96
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13
FWCI
7.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Sound and Vibration (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (11772181, 11422214)
  • Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (17SG38, 2017-01-07-00-09-E00019)
  • Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (18010500100)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Acoustics and Ultrasonics › Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Keywords
nonlinear vibration isolation, transverse vibration, quasi-zero stiffness, linear springs, primary resonance, vibration transmission, continuum structures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review