Cited by 7Sexual function and dysfunction studiesHormonal and reproductive studiesUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research

Impact of baseline total testosterone level on successful treatment of sexual dysfunction in men taking once-daily tadalafil 5 mg for lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic hyperplasia: an integrated analysis of three randomized controlled trials

Open access
Mulhall, John P., Brock, Gerald B., Glina, Sidney, Baygani, Simin, Donatucci, Craig F., Maggi, Mario·2016·The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Controversy exists as to whether erectile response to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors is compromised in men with low total testosterone (TT) levels. This is amplified by reports of improved response to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor therapy after coadministration of testosterone replacement therapy in hypogonadal men unresponsive to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors. AIM: To determine whether TT and luteinizing hormone levels influence efficacy of tadalafil for erectile dysfunction in men with concomitant lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic hyperplasia. METHODS: This integrated analysis included 1,075 men randomized to once-daily tadalafil 5 mg (n = 540) or placebo (n = 535) for 12 weeks in three prospective clinical trials who had not received concomitant testosterone replacement therapy. Subjects were categorized at baseline by low vs normal TT levels (n = 1,049; <300 vs ≥300 ng/dL) and normal vs high luteinizing hormone levels (n = 1,058; ≤9.4 vs >9.4 mIU/mL). Treatment-group differences in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) by hormone subgroups were assessed using analysis of covariance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in IIEF erectile function domain and other domain scores. RESULTS: The overall study population was comprised primarily of white men (>86%) with a mean age range of 64 to 70 years. Median baseline TT level in the integrated population was 355 ng/dL; levels were lower than 300 ng/dL (cutoff for normal) in 32.4% of men. Men with low TT levels reported diabetes (21.8%), cardiovascular disease (54.1%), and hypertension (49.1%) numerically more often than men with normal TT levels (10.6%, 43.2%, and 36.7%, respectively). Low TT and high luteinizing hormone levels were associated with numerically, but not statistically significantly, lower 12-week IIEF domain scores compared with those with normal levels. Changes in most 12-week IIEF domain scores showed that tadalafil was significantly more effective than placebo (P < .02). CONCLUSION: Low TT levels at baseline did not negatively influence response to tadalafil in men of advancing age with concomitant lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic hyperplasia and erectile dysfunction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.02.163

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Men with low to low-normal testosterone levels can respond well to PDE5 inhibitors, consistent with an analysis of 1075 men reporting that baseline testosterone levels did not influence PDE5 inhibitor responsiveness.

    “Thus, men with low to low-normal testosterone levels can respond well to PDE5 inhibitors, consistent with an analysis of 1075 men reporting that baseline testosterone levels did not influence PDE5 inhibitor responsiveness (40).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 7

Authors
Mulhall, J. P., Brock, G. B., Glina, S., Baygani, S., Donatucci, C. F., & Maggi, M.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Western University (CA)
  • Instituto H. Ellis (BR)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • University of Florence (IT)
Corresponding author
Donatucci, Craig F.
Venue
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2016-05-01
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
843-851
ISSN
  • 1743-6095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-6109
OpenAlex
W2307272292
Cited by
7
References
40
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Sexual Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Keywords
total testosterone, luteinizing hormone, tadalafil, erectile dysfunction, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, lower urinary tract symptoms, benign prostatic hyperplasia, testosterone replacement therapy, hypogonadism, International Index of Erectile Function, treatment response
MeSH terms
Tadalafil, Adult, Aged, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Middle Aged, Penile Erection, Prospective Studies, Prostatic Hyperplasia, Testosterone, Vasodilator Agents, Treatment Outcome, Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review