Laser-Based Devices for Female Genitourinary Indications: Position Statements From the European Society for Sexual Medicine (ESSM)
Abstract
Background Laser-based technologies have been commercially marketed as "wonder treatments" without a sufficient and adequate body of evidence. In addition, on July 30, 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a warning regarding the safety of the use of laser-based devices for the following indications: vaginal "rejuvenation" or cosmetic vaginal procedures, vaginal conditions and symptoms related to menopause, urinary incontinence, and sexual function. Aim To perform a thorough review of the available literature regarding laser-based vaginal devices for the treatment of female genitourinary indications and summarize the results in several short statements according to the level of evidence. Methods A comprehensive review of the literature regarding laser treatments for gynecological indications was performed based on several databases. Eligible were studies that included at least 15 patients. Outcomes Several aspects, including preclinical data, have been investigated. For each topic covered, data on laser-based devices were analyzed. Results Despite the high heterogeneity of studies and its limitations, the committee released several statements regarding the use of laser-based devices for genitourinary indications. Clinical implications Available data in the clinical setting are still poor, and the impact of these technologies on vaginal symptoms and signs has not been clearly established. Strengths & limitations All studies have been evaluated by a panel of expert…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The value of local testosterone application and of invasive measures such as vaginal laser or hyaluronic acid injections is still unclear.
“The value of local testosterone application and of invasive measures like vaginal laser or hyaluronic acid injections is still unclear.133, 134, 135”
From 5th ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 5) (2020) · cites this paper as [135]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 56 · Cited by 16
- Authors
- Romero-Otero, J., Lauterbach, R., Aversa, A., Serefoglu, E. C., García-Gómez, B., Parnham, A., Skrodzka, M., Krychman, M., Reisman, Y., Corona, G., & Lowenstein, L.
- Affiliations
- Urology Department , Madrid, , Spain
- Rambam Health Care Campus (IL)
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine , Catanzaro, , Italy
- Department of Urology , Istambul, , Turkey
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust , Manchester, , UK
- University College London (GB)
- Southern California Center for Sexual Health and Survivorship Medicine , , CA , USA
- Flare-Health , , , The Netherlands
- Azienda USL di Bologna (IT)
- Urology Department , Madrid, Spain ,
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Haifa, , Israel
- Venue
- The Journal of Sexual Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-03-19
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 841-848
- ISSN
- 1743-6095 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-6109
- OpenAlex
- W3011775923
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 0.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- The Journal of Sexual Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues
- Keywords
- vaginal rejuvenation, menopause, urinary incontinence, sexual function, laser safety, level of evidence, expert recommendations, randomized controlled trials
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Lasers, Menopause, Sexual Behavior, Vaginal Diseases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review