Conservation rules, their breakdown, and optimality in Caenorhabditis sinusoidal locomotion
Open accessAbstract
Undulatory locomotion is common to nematodes as well as to limbless vertebrates, but its control is not understood in spite of the identification of hundred of genes involved in Caenorhabditis elegans locomotion. To reveal the mechanisms of nematode undulatory locomotion, we quantitatively analysed the movement of C. elegans with genetic perturbations to neurons, muscles, and skeleton (cuticle). We also compared locomotion of different Caenorhabditis species. We constructed a theoretical model that combines mechanics and biophysics, and that is constrained by the observations of propulsion and muscular velocities, as well as wavelength and amplitude of undulations. We find that normalized wavelength is a conserved quantity among wild-type C. elegans individuals, across mutants, and across different species. The velocity of forward propulsion scales linearly with the velocity of the muscular wave and the corresponding slope is also a conserved quantity and almost optimal; the exceptions are in some mutants affecting cuticle structure. In theoretical terms, the optimality of the slope is equivalent to the exact balance between muscular and visco-elastic body reaction bending moments. We find that the amplitude and frequency of undulations are inversely correlated and provide a theoretical explanation for this fact. These experimental results are valid both for young adults and for all larval stages of wild-type C. elegans. In particular, during development, the amplitude scales linearly with the wavelength, consistent with our theory. We also investigated the influence of substrate firmness on motion parameters, and found that it does not affect the above invariants. In general, our biomechanical model can explain the observed robustness of the mechanisms controlling nematode undulatory locomotion.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous models of locomotion have typically assumed graded potential neurons, in line with available data at the time.
“Previous models of locomotion have typically assumed graded potential neurons (Niebur and Erdös, 1991; Karbowski et al., 2006; Bryden and Cohen, 2008), in line with available data at the time (Goodman et al., 1998; Nickell et al., 2002; Francis et al., 2003; O’Hagan et al., 2005).”
From Gait Modulation in C. elegans: An Integrated Neuromechanical Model (2012) · cites this paper as Karbowski et al., 2006
Cites
The structure of the nervous system of the nematode <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i>
White, J. G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J. N., & Brenner, S. (1986) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1986.0056 · Cited by 5,589 · cited 7× · see citing works
“We observe that worms’ velocity increases monotonically as they mature and this is accompanied by monotonic changes in amplitude and wavelength, with frequency exhibiting some variability.”
BackgroundResultInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dimensionality and Dynamics in the Behavior of C. elegans
Stephens, G. J., Johnson-Kerner, B., Bialek, W., & Ryu, W. S. (2008) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000028 · Cited by 509 · see citing works
Gait Modulation in C. elegans: An Integrated Neuromechanical Model
Boyle, J. H., Berri, S., & Cohen, N. (2012) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2012.00010 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
“Previous models of locomotion have typically assumed graded potential neurons (Niebur and Erdös, 1991; Karbowski et al., 2006; Bryden and Cohen, 2008), in line with available data at the time (Goodman et al., 1998; Nickell et al., 2002; Francis et al., 2003; O’Hagan et al., 2005).”
ResultMaterial Properties of Caenorhabditis elegans Swimming at Low Reynolds Number
Sznitman, J., Purohit, P. K., Krajacic, P., Lamitina, T., & Arratia, P. E. (2010) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2009.11.010 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Backholm, M., Ryu, W. S., & Dalnoki-Veress, K. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1219965110 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Izquierdo, E. J., & Beer, R. D. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2017.0374 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Cohen, N., & Ranner, T. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1702.04988 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Karbowski, J., Cronin, C. J., Seah, A., Mendel, J. E., Cleary, D., & Sternberg, P. W.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Karbowski, Jan
- Venue
- Journal of Theoretical Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 242
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 652-669
- ISSN
- 0022-5193 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2094409491
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 3.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Journal of Theoretical Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
- Keywords
- undulatory locomotion, Caenorhabditis elegans, nematode locomotion, locomotion optimization, undulation amplitude, larval development, biomechanical modeling
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Locomotion, Models, Neurological, Motor Neurons, Muscles, Skin Physiological Phenomena, Caenorhabditis elegans, Genes, Helminth, Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review