Cited by 58Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesReproductive Biology and FertilityOvarian function and disorders

A complex mathematical model of the human menstrual cycle

Reinecke, Isabel, Deuflhard, Peter·2007·Journal of Theoretical Biology

Abstract

Despite the fact that more than 100 million women worldwide use birth control pills and that half of the world's population is concerned, the menstrual cycle has so far received comparatively little attention in the field of mathematical modeling. The term menstrual cycle comprises the processes of the control system in the female body that, under healthy circumstances, lead to ovulation at regular intervals, thus making reproduction possible. If this is not the case or ovulation is not desired, the question arises how this control system can be influenced, for example, by hormonal treatments. In order to be able to cover a vast range of external manipulations, the mathematical model must comprise the main components where the processes belonging to the menstrual cycle occur, as well as their interrelations. A system of differential equations serves as the mathematical model, describing the dynamics of hormones, enzymes, receptors, and follicular phases. Since the processes take place in different parts of the body and influence each other with a certain delay, passing over to delay differential equations is deemed a reasonable step. The pulsatile release of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) is controlled by a complex neural network. We choose to model the pulse time points of this GnRH pulse generator by a stochastic process. Focus in this paper is on the model development. This rather elaborate mathematical model is the basis for a detailed analysis and could be hel…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.03.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 58

Authors
Reinecke, I., & Deuflhard, P.
Affiliations
Zuse Institute Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Reinecke, Isabel
Venue
Journal of Theoretical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
247
Issue
2
Pages
303-330
ISSN
0022-5193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102277847
Cited by
58
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Theoretical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
Keywords
menstrual cycle, mathematical model, delay differential equations, gonadotropin-releasing hormone, GnRH pulsatility, artificial neural networks, hormonal control of reproduction, ovulation, follicular phase, hormonal feedback, oral contraceptives, drug design
MeSH terms
Female, Gonadotropins, Pituitary, Ovarian Follicle, Humans, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone, Menstrual Cycle, Models, Biological, Pituitary Gland, Anterior, Stochastic Processes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review