A systemic approach to explore the flexibility of energy stores at the cellular scale: examples from muscle cells
Abstract
Variations in energy storage and expenditure are key elements for animals adaptation to rapidly changing environments. Because of the multiplicity of metabolic pathways, metabolic crossroads and interactions between anabolic and catabolic processes within and between different cells, the flexibility of energy stores in animal cells is difficult to describe by simple verbal, textual or graphic terms. We propose a mathematical model to study the influence of internal and external challenges on the dynamic behavior of energy stores and its consequence on cell energy status. The role of the flexibility of energy stores on the energy equilibrium at the cellular level is illustrated through three case studies: variation in eating frequency (i.e., glucose input), level of physical activity (i.e., ATP requirement), and changes in cell characteristics (i.e., maximum capacity of glycogen storage). Sensitivity analysis has been performed to highlight the most relevant parameters of the model; model simulations have then been performed to illustrate how variation in these key parameters affects cellular energy balance. According to this analysis, glycogen maximum accumulation capacity and homeostatic energy demand are among the most important parameters regulating muscle cell metabolism to ensure its energy equilibrium.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Maximum glycogen accumulation and homeostatic energy demand are among the most important parameters regulating muscle cell metabolism.
“maximum glycogen accumulation and homeostatic energy demand were found among the most important parameters regulating muscle cell metabolism”
From Metabolic Flexibility as an Adaptation to Energy Resources and Requirements in Health and Disease (2018) · cites this paper as [315]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 3
- Authors
- Taghipoor, M., van Milgen, J., & Gondret, F.
- Affiliations
- Institut Agro Rennes-Angers (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Taghipoor, Masoomeh
- Venue
- Journal of Theoretical Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 404
- Pages
- 331-341
- ISSN
- 0022-5193 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2467752430
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Theoretical Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
- Keywords
- energy storage flexibility, muscle cells, glycogen storage, meal frequency, physical activity, ATP demand, sensitivity analysis
- MeSH terms
- Adenosine Diphosphate, Adenosine Triphosphate, Energy Metabolism, Glucose, Glycogen, Models, Biological, Phenotype, Time Factors, Muscle Cells, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Metabolome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review