The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Surgical ablation as treatment for the elimination of atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Objective The maze procedure is recognized as the most effective surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. In the last few years, new surgical ablation techniques were developed involving the left atrium only and modifications of the maze procedure in ablating both atria. For this study, we evaluated the evidence regarding the effectiveness of the surgical ablation procedures (biatrial and left atrial) in reducing postoperative atrial fibrillation and subsequent survival.Methods MEDLINE was searched for English-language studies using the terms "maze," "atrial fibrillation," and "surgical treatment" for 1995 through August 2005. Primary outcomes of interest were postoperative survival and postoperative freedom from atrial fibrillation. Survival data were collected at 1-, 2-, and 3-year intervals. Freedom from atrial fibrillation was collected at 3 months and at 1-, 2-, and 3-year intervals.Results Sixty-nine studies were included in this analysis. Five thousand eight hundred eighty-five total patients were involved. Patients undergoing surgical ablation (range, 90.4-85.4) demonstrated significantly greater rates of freedom from atrial fibrillation compared with those seen in control patients (range, 47.2-60.9). Survival rates among patients with biatrial surgical procedures (range, 94.9-92.8) were similar to those who had left atrial procedures only (range, 93.9-89.4). However, patients undergoing biatrial ablation (range, 92.0-87.1 vs 86.1-73.4) demonstrated superior freedom from atrial fibrillation at all time points.Conclusion Biatrial ablation surgical procedures were more effective in controlling atrial fibrillation than procedures confined to the left atrium. To encourage the use of future meta-analysis within the surgical literature, we suggest the more frequent reporting of either through Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and the reporting of rates for specific time intervals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Biatrial lesion patterns may be more effective in persistent and long-standing persistent AF. 797,803,806”
From 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS (2016) · cites this paper as [797]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins.
Haïssaguerre, M., Jaïs, P., Shah, D. C., Takahashi, A., Hocini, M., Quiniou, G., Garrigue, S., Mouroux, A. L., Métayer, P. L., & Clémenty, J. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199809033391003 · Cited by 8,040
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Hunter, J., & Schmidt, F. (2004) · doi:10.4135/9781412985031 · Cited by 3,023
Nademanee, K., McKenzie, J. P., Kosar, E. M., Schwab, M., Sunsaneewitayakul, B., Vasavakul, T., Khunnawat, C., & Ngarmukos, T. (2004) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.12.054 · Cited by 2,004
Prasad, S. M., Maniar, H. S., Camillo, C. J., Schuessler, R. B., Boineau, J. P., Sundt, T. M., Cox, J. L., & Damiano, R. J. (2003) · Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0022-5223(03)01287-x · Cited by 550
An 8½-Year Clinical Experience with Surgery for Atrial Fibrillation
Cox, J. L., Schuessler, R. B., Lappas, D. G., & Boineau, J. P. (1996) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199609000-00003 · Cited by 424
Mohr, F. W., Fabricius, A., Falk, V., Autschbach, R., Doll, N., Oppell, U. O. V., Diegeler, A., Kottkamp, H., & Hindricks, G. (2002) · Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1067/mtc.2002.120730 · Cited by 266
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hindricks, G., Potpara, T., Dagres, N., Arbelo, E., Bax, J. J., Blomström‐Lundqvist, C., Boriani, G., Castella, M., Dan, G.-A., Dilaveris, P., et al. (2020) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612 · Cited by 10,550
2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS
Kirchhof, P. F., Benussi, S., Kotecha, D., Ahlsson, A., Atar, D., Casadei, B., Castellà, M., Diener, H., Heidbüchel, H., Hendriks, J., et al. (2016) · EP Europace · doi:10.1093/europace/euw295 · Cited by 6,438
2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS
Kirchhof, P., Benussi, S., Kotecha, D., Ahlsson, A., Atar, D., Casadei, B., Castella, M., Diener, H.-C., Heidbuchel, H., Hendriks, J., et al. (2016) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210 · Cited by 6,418
Guidelines on myocardial revascularization
Wijns, W. C., Kolh, P. H., Danchin, N., Mario, C. D., Falk, V., Folliguet, T. A., Garg, S., Huber, K., James, S. K., Knuuti, J., et al. (2010) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq277 · Cited by 3,228
Gelder, I. C. V., Rienstra, M., Bunting, K. V., Casado-Arroyo, R., Caso, V., Crijns, H. J. G. M., Potter, T. J. R. D., Dwight, J., Guasti, L., Hanke, T., et al. (2024) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae176 · Cited by 3,594
Metadata
- Authors
- Barnett, S. D., & Ad, N.
- Affiliations
- Inova Health System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Barnett, Scott D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1029-1035
- ISSN
- 0022-5223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053700528
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
- Keywords
- atrial fibrillation, surgical ablation, maze procedure, biatrial ablation, left atrial ablation, postoperative atrial fibrillation, postoperative survival, atrial fibrillation recurrence
- MeSH terms
- Atrial Fibrillation, Humans, Recurrence, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Catheter Ablation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
