The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dietary copper and human health: Current evidence and unresolved issues
Open accessAbstract
Although copper (Cu) is recognized as an essential trace element, uncertainties remain regarding Cu reference values for humans, as illustrated by discrepancies between recommendations issued by different national authorities. This review examines human studies published since 1990 on relationships between Cu intake, Cu balance, biomarkers of Cu status, and health. It points out several gaps and unresolved issues which make it difficult to assess Cu requirements. Results from balance studies suggest that daily intakes below 0.8 mg/day lead to net Cu losses, while net gains are consistently observed above 2.4 mg/day. However, because of an incomplete collection of losses in all studies, a precise estimation of Cu requirements cannot be derived from available data. Data regarding the relationship between Cu intake and potential biomarkers are either too preliminary or inconclusive because of low specificity or low sensitivity to change in dietary Cu over a wide range of intakes. Results from observation and intervention studies do not support a link between Cu and a risk of cardiovascular disease, cognitive decline, arthritis or cancer for intakes ranging from 0.6 to 3mg/day, and limited evidence exists for impaired immune function in healthy subjects with a very low (0.38 mg/day) Cu intake. However, data from observation studies should be regarded with caution because of uncertainties regarding Cu concentration in various foods and water. Further studies that accurately evaluate Cu exposure based on reliable biomarkers of Cu status are needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
COVID-19: The Inflammation Link and the Role of Nutrition in Potential Mitigation
Zabetakis, I., Lordan, R., Norton, C., & Tsoupras, A. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12051466 · Cited by 532
Antimicrobial Copper-Based Materials and Coatings: Potential Multifaceted Biomedical Applications
Mitra, D., Kang, E.-T., & Neoh, K. G. (2020) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.9b17815 · Cited by 322
Relationships between food and diseases: what to know to ensure food safety
Gallo, M., Ferrara, L., Calogero, A., Montesano, D., & Naviglio, D. (2020) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109414 · Cited by 306
Puentes-Díaz, N., Chaparro, D., Morales-Morales, D., Flores-Gaspar, A., & Alí-Torres, J. (2023) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.2c06939 · Cited by 67
Biological role of copper as an essential trace element in the human organism
Pavelková, M., Vysloužil, J., Kubová, K., & Vetchý, D. (2018) · Česká a slovenská farmacie · doi:10.36290/csf.2018.021 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Bost, M., Houdart, S., Oberli, M., Kalonji, E., Huneau, J.-F., & Margaritis, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-05
- Volume
- 35
- Pages
- 107-115
- ISSN
- 0946-672X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2289367243
- Cited by
- 756
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dietary copper and human health: Current evidence and unresolved issues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jtemb.2016.02.006
- The paper
- Bost, M., Houdart, S., Oberli, M., Kalonji, E., Huneau, J.-F., & Margaritis, I. (2016). Dietary copper and human health: Current evidence and unresolved issues. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2016.02.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.