Cited by 19Thermoregulation and physiological responsesCardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and Training

CORE™ wearable sensor: comparison against gastrointestinal temperature during cold water ingestion and a 5 km running time-trial

Open access
Jolicoeur Desroches, Antoine, Naulleau, Catherine, Deshayes, Thomas A., Pancrate, Timothée, Goulet, Eric D.B.·2023·Journal of Thermal Biology

Abstract

Five km running time-trials (TT) are associated with rapid and significant increases in core body temperature (T C ). For such races, real-time feedback from pre-exercise and exercise T C may be helpful in the design of an optimal pacing strategy aimed at limiting the possibility of developing heat-related illnesses. This study compared measurements of T C obtained with a wearable device, the CORE™, to those of a gastrointestinal pill (GI pill), during cold water ingestion and a 5 km running TT. Twelve participants (25 ± 4 yrs) ingested 7.5 mL/kg fat-free mass of 4 °C water over the first 5 min of a 120 min sitting period, after which they completed a 5 km running TT at 30 °C, 50% relative humidity. A T C difference > ± 0.25 °C between sensors was deemed clinically unacceptable. Prior to water ingestion, the CORE-derived T C was 0.49 ± 0.25 °C lower than the GI pill. The CORE was irresponsive to the 0.26 ± 0.22 °C peak decline in T C captured with the GI pill 40 min following water ingestion. Prior to the TT, T C was 0.30 ± 0.25 °C lower with the CORE than the GI pill. During the TT, the CORE underestimated the rate of increase in T C by 0.0125 ± 0.019 °C/min compared with the GI pill, and mean absolute difference in T C between sensors was of 0.47 ± 0.34 °C. In conclusion, the CORE does not capture the cooling effect of cold water ingestion and provides a clinically relevant underestimation of T C during a 5 km running TT in the heat.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2023.103622

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CORE sensors are shown to perform well in tracking rates of change, thus the delta Tcore differences observed in this study between active and less-active participants are likely valid.

    “Furthermore, CORE sensors are shown to perform well in tracking rates of change,59 thus the delta Tcore differences observed in this study between active and less-active participants are likely valid.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jolicoeur Desroches, A., Naulleau, C., Deshayes, T. A., Pancrate, T., & Goulet, E. D. B.
Affiliations
Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
Corresponding author
Goulet, Eric D.B.
Venue
Journal of Thermal Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-07
Volume
115
Pages
103622
ISSN
0306-4565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4380785061
Cited by
19
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Thermal Biology (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Université de Sherbrooke
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
core body temperature, wearable temperature sensors, cold water ingestion, cooling effect, heat exposure, pacing strategy, heat-related illness, sensor accuracy
MeSH terms
Body Temperature, Cold Temperature, Drinking, Hot Temperature, Humans, Running, Temperature, Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review