EGFR T790M and C797S Mutations as Mechanisms of Acquired Resistance to Dacomitinib
Open accessAbstract
Introduction Dacomitinib was superior to gefitinib in terms of progression-free survival in patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer in a recent ARCHER 1050 trial. However, despite a marked initial response, lung cancers eventually acquire resistance to these inhibitors. This study aimed to elucidate the mechanisms of acquired resistance to dacomitinib in vitro. Methods Dacomitinib-resistant clones were established by exposure to fixed concentrations of dacomitinib by using N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) mutagenesis or by chronic exposure to increasing concentrations of dacomitinib without ENU. EGFR secondary mutations were analyzed by Sanger sequencing. Time to resistance in each clone was compared according to the mutational status. EGFR Del19, L858R, and G719A mutations were introduced into Ba/F3 cells by using retroviral vectors. Results Chronic exposure to dacomitinib without ENU induced T790M in Ba/F3 cells expressing Del19. ENU mutagenesis resulted in 171 dacomitinib-resistant clones. Among these clones, 90% acquired T790M. However, C797S occurred in 11% of L858R-mutant clones (four of 35) and in 24% of G719A-mutant clones (12 of 38) established by using low-dose dacomitinib. Time to resistance was not significantly different between T790M- and C797S-mutant clones in both of L858R clones (p = 0.93) and G719A clones (p = 0.86). Cells expressing Del19 that acquired T790M were sensitive to osimertinib, whereas cells with L858R plus C797S mutations were sensitive to gefitinib or erlotinib. Conclusions These in vitro data demonstrate that dacomitinib can directly induce T790M or C797S secondary mutations. Our data suggest the importance of analyzing these secondary mutations because appropriate selection of EGFR inhibitors could overcome acquired resistance to dacomitinib in a subset of lung cancers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
T790M is detected in around 50-70% of patients with resistance to afatinib and is likely associated with clinical resistance to dacomitinib.
“Likewise, T790M is detected in around 50–70% of patients with resistance to afatinib91,92 and is also likely to be associated with clinical resistance to dacomitinib.93”
From Afatinib for the treatment of <i>EGFR</i> mutation-positive NSCLC: A review of clinical findings (2020) · cites this paper as [93]
Cites
Osimertinib or Platinum–Pemetrexed in <i>EGFR</i> T790M–Positive Lung Cancer
Mok, T. S., Wu, Y.-L., Ahn, M.-J., Garassino, M. C., Kim, H. R., Ramalingam, S. S., Shepherd, F. A., He, Y., Akamatsu, H., Theelen, W. S. M. E., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1612674 · Cited by 3,379 · see citing works
EGFR Mutations and Resistance to Irreversible Pyrimidine-Based EGFR Inhibitors
Ercan, D., Choi, H. G., Yun, C.-H., Capelletti, M., Xie, T., Eck, M. J., Gray, N. S., & Jänne, P. A. (2015) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-2789 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Jänne, P. A., Boss, D. S., Camidge, D. R., Britten, C. D., Engelman, J. A., Garon, E. B., Guo, F., Wong, S., Liang, J., Letrent, S., et al. (2011) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-1220 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Molecular targeted therapy for anticancer treatment
Min, H.-Y., & Lee, H.-Y. (2022) · Experimental & Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/s12276-022-00864-3 · Cited by 569 · see citing works
Properties of FDA-approved small molecule protein kinase inhibitors
Roskoski, R. (2019) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2019.03.006 · Cited by 554 · see citing works
Afatinib for the treatment of <i>EGFR</i> mutation-positive NSCLC: A review of clinical findings
Harvey, R. D., Adams, V. R., Beardslee, T., & Medina, P. (2020) · Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice · doi:10.1177/1078155220931926 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kobayashi, Y., Fujino, T., Nishino, M., Koga, T., Chiba, M., Sesumi, Y., Ohara, S., Shimoji, M., Tomizawa, K., Takemoto, T., & Mitsudomi, T.
- Affiliations
- Kindai University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Mitsudomi, Tetsuya
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Thoracic Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 727-731
- ISSN
- 1556-0864 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2785626971
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Thoracic Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16K19989, 16K18462, 16H05433)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- dacomitinib, acquired drug resistance, T790M mutation, C797S mutation, EGFR-mutant lung cancer, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, L858R mutation, osimertinib, gefitinib, erlotinib, secondary mutations
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Mutation, Transfection, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Mice, Quinazolinones, ErbB Receptors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review