Cited by 205Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsBrain Metastases and TreatmentLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

The Incidence of Brain Metastases in Stage IV ROS1-Rearranged Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer and Rate of Central Nervous System Progression on Crizotinib

Open access
Patil, Tejas, Smith, Derek E., Bunn, Paul A., Aisner, Dara L., Le, Anh T., Hancock, Mark, Purcell, William T., Bowles, Daniel W. +2 more·2018·Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Abstract

Introduction Central nervous system (CNS) metastases in lung cancer are a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality. There are conflicting data on the incidence of CNS metastases in stage IV ROS1-positive NSCLC and the rate of CNS progression during crizotinib therapy.Methods A retrospective review of 579 patients with stage IV NSCLC between June 2008 and December 2017 was performed. Brain metastases and oncogene status (ROS1, ALK receptor tyrosine kinase gene [ALK], EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, and others) were recorded. We measured progression-free survival and time to CNS progression in ROS1-positive and ALK-positive patients who were taking crizotinib.Results We identified 33 ROS1-positive and 115 ALK-positive patients with stage IV NSCLC. The incidences of brain metastases for treatment-naive, stage IV ROS1-positive and ALK-positive NSCLC were 36% (12 of 33) and 34% (39 of 115), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in incidence of brain metastases across ROS1, ALK, EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, or other mutations. Complete survival data were available for 19 ROS1-positive and 83 ALK-positive patients. The median progression-free survival times for ROS1-positive and ALK-positive patients were 11 and 8 months, respectively (p = 0.304). The CNS was the first and sole site of progression in 47% of ROS1-positive (nine of 19) and 33% of ALK-positive (28 of 83) patients, with no statistically significant differences between these groups (p = 0.610).Conclusions Brain metastases are common in treatment-naive stage IV ROS1-positive NSCLC, though the incidence does not differ from that in other oncogene cohorts. The CNS is a common first site of progression in ROS1-positive patients who are taking crizotinib. This study reinforces the importance of developing CNS-penetrant tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with ROS1-positive NSCLC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.07.001

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy showed higher ORR and longer median PFS, but CNS metastases developed in nearly 50% of patients with ROS1+ NSCLC.

    “While a higher objective response rate (ORR) and longer median progression-free survival (PFS) were observed with first-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy (CT), CNS metastases developed in nearly 50% of patients with ROS1+ NSCLC.10-13”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 205

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [27]Gainor JF, Tseng D, Yoda S, Dagogo-Jack I, Friboulet L, Hubbeling HG, Farago AF, Schultz KR, Ferris LA, Piotrowska Z, Hardwick J, Huang D, Mino-Kenudson M, Iafrate AJ, Hata AN, Yeap BY, Shaw AT Patterns of Metastatic Spread and Mechanisms of Resistance to Crizotinib in ROS1-Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. JCO Precis Oncol 2017. PMC5766287 29333528

Authors
Patil, T., Smith, D. E., Bunn, P. A., Aisner, D. L., Le, A. T., Hancock, M., Purcell, W. T., Bowles, D. W., Camidge, D. R., & Doebele, R. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • Children's Hospital Colorado (US)
Corresponding author
Patil, Tejas
Venue
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
13
Issue
11
Pages
1717-1726
ISSN
1556-0864 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2846588575
Cited by
205
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 3
FWCI
12.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Thoracic Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
University of Colorado Lung Cancer Specialized Program of Research Excellence (P50CA058187)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Brain Metastases and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
ROS1 rearrangement, non-small cell lung cancer, brain metastases, crizotinib, central nervous system progression, ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, progression-free survival, stage IV lung cancer, oncogenic mutations
MeSH terms
Crizotinib, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents, Brain Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Protein-Tyrosine Kinases, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Retrospective Studies, Gene Rearrangement, Incidence, Disease Progression, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review