Nivolumab monotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab in recurrent small cell lung cancer: results from the CheckMate 032 randomized cohort
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Nivolumab monotherapy is approved in the United States for third-line or later metastatic small cell lung cancer based on pooled data from nonrandomized and randomized cohorts of the multicenter, open-label, phase 1/2 trial of nivolumab ± ipilimumab (CheckMate 032; NCT01928394). We report updated results, including long-term overall survival (OS), from the randomized cohort. METHODS: Patients with small cell lung cancer and disease progression after one to two prior chemotherapy regimens were randomized 3:2 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Patients were stratified by number of prior chemotherapy regimens and treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review. RESULTS: Overall, 147 patients received nivolumab and 96 nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Minimum follow-up for ORR/progression-free survival/safety was 11.9 months (nivolumab) and 11.2 months (nivolumab plus ipilimumab). ORR increased with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (21.9% versus 11.6% with nivolumab; odds ratio: 2.12; 95% confidence interval: 1.06-4.26; p = 0.03). For long-term OS, minimum follow-up was 29.0 months (nivolumab) versus 28.4 months (nivolumab plus ipilimumab); median (95% confidence interval) OS was 5.7 (3.8-7.6) versus 4.7 months (3.1-8.3). Twenty-four-month OS rates were 17.9% (nivolumab) and 16.9% (nivolumab plus ipilimumab). Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse event rates were 12.9% (nivolumab) versus 37.5% (nivolumab plus ipilimumab), and treatment-related deaths were n =1 versus n = 3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas ORR (primary endpoint) was higher with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab, OS was similar between groups. In each group, OS remained encouraging with long-term follow-up. Toxicities were more common with combination therapy versus nivolumab monotherapy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The trend toward cumulative immune-related adverse events is consistent with immune-related adverse events reported in adults treated with this combination.
“This is consistent with irAEs reported in adults treated with this combination27,36–38.”
Cites
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534 · see citing works
Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma
Larkin, J., Chiarion-Sileni, V., Gonzalez, R., Grob, J. J., Cowey, C. L., Lao, C. D., Schadendorf, D., Dummer, R., Smylie, M., Rutkowski, P., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1504030 · Cited by 8,157 · see citing works
Self-citationNivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma
Motzer, R. J., Tannir, N. M., McDermott, D. F., Arén Frontera, O., Melichar, B., Choueiri, T. K., Plimack, E. R., Barthélémy, P., Porta, C., George, S., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1712126 · Cited by 4,656 · see citing works
Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in lung cancer with a high tumor mutational burden
Hellmann, M. D., Ciuleanu, T.-E., Pluzanski, A., Lee, J. S., Otterson, G. A., Audigier-Valette, C., Minenza, E., Linardou, H., Burgers, S., Salman, P., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1801946 · Cited by 3,063 · see citing works
Self-citationOverman, M. J., McDermott, R., Leach, J. L., Lonardi, S., Lenz, H.-J., Morse, M. A., Desai, J., Hill, A., Axelson, M., Moss, R. A., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30422-9 · Cited by 2,836 · see citing works
Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
Hellmann, M. D., Paz-Ares, L., Bernabe Caro, R., Zurawski, B., Kim, S.-W., Carcereny Costa, E., Park, K., Alexandru, A., Lupinacci, L., de la Mora Jimenez, E., et al. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1910231 · Cited by 2,823 · see citing works
Self-citationReady, N., Hellmann, M. D., Awad, M. M., Otterson, G. A., Gutierrez, M., Gainor, J. F., Borghaei, H., Jolivet, J., Horn, L., Mates, M., et al. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.18.01042 · Cited by 581 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Davis, K. L., Fox, E., Isikwei, E., Reid, J. M., Liu, X., Minard, C. G., Voss, S., Berg, S. L., Weigel, B. J., & Mackall, C. L. (2022) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-2164 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ready, N. E., Ott, P. A., Hellmann, M. D., Zugazagoitia, J., Hann, C. L., de Braud, F., Antonia, S. J., Ascierto, P. A., Moreno, V., Atmaca, A., Salvagni, S., Taylor, M., Amin, A., Camidge, D. R., Horn, L., Calvo, E., Li, A., Lin, W. H., Callahan, M. K., & Spigel, D. R.
- Affiliations
- Duke Medical Center (US)
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre (ES)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" (IT)
- Krankenhaus Nordwest (DE)
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola (IT)
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Levine Cancer Institute (US)
- University of Colorado Denver (US)
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center (US)
- Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) (US)
- Sarah Cannon (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ready, Neal E.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Thoracic Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 426-435
- ISSN
- 1556-0864 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2980593108
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 51
- FWCI
- 16.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Thoracic Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Ono Pharmaceutical
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Keywords
- nivolumab, ipilimumab, small cell lung cancer, relapsed small cell lung cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitors, PD-1 inhibitors, CTLA-4 inhibitors, combination immunotherapy, third-line therapy, overall survival, objective response rate, treatment-related adverse events, immune-related adverse events, long-term follow-up
- MeSH terms
- Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review