Cited by 315Lung Cancer Research StudiesCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations

Nivolumab monotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab in recurrent small cell lung cancer: results from the CheckMate 032 randomized cohort

Open access
Ready, Neal E., Ott, Patrick A., Hellmann, Matthew D., Zugazagoitia, Jon, Hann, Christine L., de Braud, Filippo, Antonia, Scott J., Ascierto, Paolo A. +12 more·2020·Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Nivolumab monotherapy is approved in the United States for third-line or later metastatic small cell lung cancer based on pooled data from nonrandomized and randomized cohorts of the multicenter, open-label, phase 1/2 trial of nivolumab ± ipilimumab (CheckMate 032; NCT01928394). We report updated results, including long-term overall survival (OS), from the randomized cohort. METHODS: Patients with small cell lung cancer and disease progression after one to two prior chemotherapy regimens were randomized 3:2 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Patients were stratified by number of prior chemotherapy regimens and treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review. RESULTS: Overall, 147 patients received nivolumab and 96 nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Minimum follow-up for ORR/progression-free survival/safety was 11.9 months (nivolumab) and 11.2 months (nivolumab plus ipilimumab). ORR increased with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (21.9% versus 11.6% with nivolumab; odds ratio: 2.12; 95% confidence interval: 1.06-4.26; p = 0.03). For long-term OS, minimum follow-up was 29.0 months (nivolumab) versus 28.4 months (nivolumab plus ipilimumab); median (95% confidence interval) OS was 5.7 (3.8-7.6) versus 4.7 months (3.1-8.3). Twenty-four-month OS rates were 17.9% (nivolumab) and 16.9% (nivolumab plus ipilimumab). Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse event rates were 12.9% (nivolumab) versus 37.5% (nivolumab plus ipilimumab), and treatment-related deaths were n =1 versus n = 3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas ORR (primary endpoint) was higher with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab, OS was similar between groups. In each group, OS remained encouraging with long-term follow-up. Toxicities were more common with combination therapy versus nivolumab monotherapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.10.004

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ready, N. E., Ott, P. A., Hellmann, M. D., Zugazagoitia, J., Hann, C. L., de Braud, F., Antonia, S. J., Ascierto, P. A., Moreno, V., Atmaca, A., Salvagni, S., Taylor, M., Amin, A., Camidge, D. R., Horn, L., Calvo, E., Li, A., Lin, W. H., Callahan, M. K., & Spigel, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre (ES)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
  • Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" (IT)
  • Krankenhaus Nordwest (DE)
  • IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola (IT)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Levine Cancer Institute (US)
  • University of Colorado Denver (US)
  • Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center (US)
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) (US)
  • Sarah Cannon (US)
Corresponding author
Ready, Neal E.
Venue
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
426-435
ISSN
1556-0864 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2980593108
Cited by
315
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 51
FWCI
16.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Thoracic Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Ono Pharmaceutical
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Keywords
nivolumab, ipilimumab, small cell lung cancer, relapsed small cell lung cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitors, PD-1 inhibitors, CTLA-4 inhibitors, combination immunotherapy, third-line therapy, overall survival, objective response rate, treatment-related adverse events, immune-related adverse events, long-term follow-up
MeSH terms
Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review