Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 302

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

IMpower150 Final Exploratory Analyses for Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy in Key NSCLC Patient Subgroups With EGFR Mutations or Metastases in the Liver or Brain

Open access
Nogami, Naoyuki, Barlesi, Fabrice, Socinski, Mark A., Reck, Martin, Thomas, Christian A., Cappuzzo, Federico, Mok, Tony S.K., Finley, Gene, Aerts, Joachim G., Orlandi, Francisco, Moro-Sibilot, Denis, Jotte, Robert M., Stroyakovskiy, Daniil, Villaruz, Liza C., Rodríguez-Abreu, Delvys, Wan-Teck Lim, Darren, Merritt, David, Coleman, Shelley, Lee, Anthony, Shankar, Geetha, Yu, Wei, Bara, Ilze, Nishio, Makoto·2022·Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Final overall survival (OS) analyses are presented for EGFR mutations and liver or brain metastases subgroups in the phase III IMpower150 study (NCT02366143) evaluating atezolizumab+bevacizumab+carboplatin/paclitaxel (ABCP) or atezolizumab+carboplatin/paclitaxel (ACP) vs bevacizumab+carboplatin/paclitaxel (BCP). METHODS Overall, 1202 patients (intention-to-treat [ITT] population) with chemotherapy-naive, metastatic, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer were randomized to ABCP, ACP or BCP. Patients with treated, stable brain metastases were permitted. OS was assessed in EGFR mutations and baseline liver metastases subgroups; rate and time to development (TTD) of new brain metastases was assessed in ITT patients. RESULTS At data cutoff (September 13, 2019; median follow-up, 39.3 months), OS improvements were sustained with ABCP versus BCP in sensitizing EGFR mutations (all: hazard ratio [HR] 0.60; 95% CI: 0.31-1.14; prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI]: HR 0.74; 95% CI: 0.38-1.46) and baseline liver metastases (HR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.45-1.02) subgroups. ACP did not show survival benefit versus BCP in sensitizing EGFR mutations (all: HR 1.0; 95% CI: 0.57-1.74; prior TKI: HR 1.22; 95% CI: 0.68-2.22) or liver metastases (HR 1.01; 95% CI: 0.68-1.51) subgroups. Overall, 100 patients (8.3%) developed new brain metastases. While not formally evaluated, an improvement toward delayed TTD was seen with ABCP vs BCP (HR, 0.68; 95% CI: 0.39-1.19). CONCLUSIONS This final exploratory analysis showed OS benefits for ABCP versus BCP in patients with sensitizing EGFR mutations, including those with prior TKI failures, and with liver metastases, although these results should be interpreted with caution. The impact of ABCP on delaying the development of new brain lesions requires further investigation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.09.014

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 302

Metadata

Authors
Nogami, N., Barlesi, F., Socinski, M. A., Reck, M., Thomas, C. A., Cappuzzo, F., Mok, T. S. K., Finley, G., Aerts, J. G., Orlandi, F., Moro-Sibilot, D., Jotte, R. M., Stroyakovskiy, D., Villaruz, L. C., Rodríguez-Abreu, D., Wan-Teck Lim, D., Merritt, D., Coleman, S., Lee, A., Shankar, G., Yu, W., Bara, I., & Nishio, M.
Venue
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
309-323
ISSN
1556-0864 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3204380660
Cited by
302
References
10
FWCI
25.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IMpower150 Final Exploratory Analyses for Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy in Key NSCLC Patient Subgroups With EGFR Mutations or Metastases in the Liver or Brain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jtho.2021.09.014
The paper
Nogami, N., Barlesi, F., Socinski, M. A., Reck, M., Thomas, C. A., Cappuzzo, F., Mok, T. S. K., Finley, G., Aerts, J. G., Orlandi, F., Moro-Sibilot, D., Jotte, R. M., Stroyakovskiy, D., Villaruz, L. C., Rodríguez-Abreu, D., Wan-Teck Lim, D., Merritt, D., Coleman, S., Lee, A., . . . Nishio, M. (2022). IMpower150 Final Exploratory Analyses for Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy in Key NSCLC Patient Subgroups With EGFR Mutations or Metastases in the Liver or Brain. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2021.09.014

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.