Cited by 97Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Clinicopathologic and Genomic Factors Impacting Efficacy of First-Line Chemoimmunotherapy in Advanced NSCLC

Open access
Alessi, Joao V., Elkrief, Arielle, Ricciuti, Biagio, Wang, Xinan, Cortellini, Alessio, Vaz, Victor R., Lamberti, Giuseppe, Frias, Rosa L. +20 more·2023·Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Abstract

Introduction Although programmed cell death protein 1 and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy has become a mainstay of first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC, factors associated with efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) are not well characterized. Methods In this multicenter retrospective analysis, clinicopathologic and genomic data were collected from patients with advanced NSCLC (lacking sensitizing genomic alterations in EGFR and ALK) and evaluated with clinical outcomes to first-line CIT. Results Among 1285 patients treated with CIT, a worsening performance status and increasing derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in the blood were associated with a significantly reduced objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS). With increasing PD-L1 tumor proportion scores of less than 1%, 1% to 49%, 50% to 89%, and greater than or equal to 90%, there was a progressive improvement in ORR (32.7% versus 37.5% versus 51.6% versus 61.7%, p < 0.001), mPFS (5.0 versus 6.1 versus 6.8 versus 13.0 mo, p < 0.001), and generally mOS (12.9 versus 14.6 versus 34.7 versus 23.1 mo, p = 0.009), respectively. Of 789 NSCLCs with comprehensive genomic data, NSCLCs with a tumor mutational burden (TMB) greater than or equal to the 90th percentile had an improved ORR (53.5% versus 36.4%, p = 0.004), mPFS (10.8 versus 5.5 mo, p < 0.001), and mOS (29.2 versus 13.1 mo, p < 0.001), compared with those with a TMB less than the 90th percentile. In all-comers with nonsquamous NSCLC, the presence of an STK11, KEAP1, or SMARCA4 mutation was associated with significantly worse ORR, mPFS, and mOS to CIT (all p < 0.05); this was also observed in the KRAS-mutant subgroup of NSCLCs with co-occurring mutations in STK11, KEAP1, or SMARCA4 (all p < 0.05). In KRAS wild-type NSCLC, KEAP1 and SMARCA4 mutations were associated with a significantly shorter mPFS and mOS to CIT (all p < 0.05), but STK11 mutation status had no significant impact on mPFS (p = 0.16) or mOS (p = 0.38). Conclusions In advanced NSCLC, better patient performance status, low derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, increasing PD-L1 expression, a very high TMB, and STK11/KEAP1/SMARCA4 wild-type status are associated with improved clinical outcomes to first-line CIT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.01.091

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies have shown that loss of KEAP1 is also associated with immunotherapy resistance.

    “Several studies have shown that loss of KEAP1 is also associated with immunotherapy resistance (1, 47).”

    From TNG260 Is a Small-Molecule CoREST Inhibitor That Sensitizes <i>STK11</i> -Mutant Tumors to Anti–PD-1 Immunotherapy (2025) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Results (page unavailable) associate KEAP1 mutations with reduced efficacy of first-line chemoimmunotherapy in nonsquamous NSCLC, and the Discussion reports impaired outcomes with immunotherapy in KRAS-mutant NSCLC. These passages support an association with poorer treatment outcomes, but the paper studies KEAP1 mutations rather than directly establishing that loss of KEAP1 causes resistance to immunotherapy itself. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. [1]Reck M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, Updated analysis of KEYNOTE-024:pembrolizumab versus platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion score of 50% or greater. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37: 537– 546. 30620668
  2. [2]Mok TSK, Wu YL, Kudaba I, Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for previously untreated, PD-L1-expressing, locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-042): a randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019; 393: 1819– 1830. 30955977
  3. [4]Herbst RS, Giaccone G, de Marinis F, Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of PD-L1-selected patients with NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383: 1328– 1339. 32997907
  4. [9]Paz-Ares L, Ciuleanu TE, Cobo M, First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined with two cycles of chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 9LA): an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021; 22: 198– 211. 33476593
  5. [10]Rizvi H, Sanchez-Vega F, La K, Molecular determinants of response to anti-programmed cell death (PD)-1 and anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer profiled with targeted next-generation sequencing. J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36: 633– 641. 29337640 PMC6075848
  6. [11]Mazieres J, Drilon A, Lusque A, Immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with advanced lung cancer and oncogenic driver alterations: results from the immuno-target registry. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Oncol. 2019; 30: 1321– 1328. PMC7389252 31125062
  7. [13]Aguilar EJ, Ricciuti B, Gainor JF, Outcomes to first-line pembrolizumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and very high PD-L1 expression. Ann Oncol. 2019; 30: 1653– 1659. 31435660
  8. [14]Ricciuti B, Arbour KC, Lin JJ, Diminished efficacy of programmed death-(ligand)1 inhibition in STK11- and KEAP1-mutant lung adenocarcinoma is affected by KRAS mutation status. J Thorac Oncol. 2022; 17: 399– 410. 34740862 PMC10980559
  9. [15]Alessi JV, Ricciuti B, Jiménez-Aguilar E, Outcomes to first-line pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1-high (≥50%) non-small cell lung cancer and a poor performance status. J Immunother Cancer. 2020; 8: e001007. 32753547 PMC7406027
  10. [16]Gainor JF, Rizvi H, Jimenez Aguilar E, Clinical activity of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) blockade in never, light, and heavy smokers with non-small-cell lung cancer and PD-L1 expression ≥50%. Ann Oncol. 2020; 31: 404– 411. 32067682 PMC7545963
  11. [17]Alessi JV, Ricciuti B, Alden SL, Low peripheral blood derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) is associated with increased tumor T-cell infiltration and favorable outcomes to first-line pembrolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 2021; 9: e003536. 34824161 PMC8627393
  12. [19]Marabelle A, Fakih M, Lopez J, Association of tumour mutational burden with outcomes in patients with advanced solid tumours treated with pembrolizumab: prospective biomarker analysis of the multicohort, open-label, phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study. Lancet. Oncol 2020; 21: 1353– 1365. 32919526
  13. [20]Yarchoan M, Hopkins A, Jaffee EM. Tumor mutational burden and response rate to PD-1 inhibition. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377: 2500– 2501. 29262275 PMC6549688
  14. [21]Ricciuti B, Wang X, Alessi JV, Association of high tumor mutation burden in non-small cell lung cancers with increased immune infiltration and improved clinical outcomes of PD-L1 blockade across PD-L1 expression levels. JAMA Oncol. 2022; 8: 1160– 1168. 35708671 PMC9204620
  15. [23]Gadgeel S, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Speranza G, Updated analysis from KEYNOTE-189: pembrolizumab or placebo plus pemetrexed and platinum for previously untreated metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020; 38: 1505– 1517. 32150489
  16. [24]Garassino M, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S, OA04.06 evaluation of TMB in KEYNOTE-189: pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy vs placebo plus chemotherapy for nonsquamous NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 2019; 14: S216– S217.
  17. [25]Alessi JV, Ricciuti B, Spurr LF, SMARCA4 and other SWItch/Sucrose nonfermentable family genomic alterations in NSCLC: clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes to immune checkpoint inhibition. J Thorac Oncol. 2021; 16: 1176– 1187. 33845210
  18. [26]Schoenfeld AJ, Bandlamudi C, Lavery JA, The genomic landscape of SMARCA4 alterations and associations with outcomes in patients with lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2020; 26: 5701– 5708. 32709715 PMC7641983
  19. [27]Vokes NI, Liu D, Ricciuti B, Harmonization of tumor mutational burden quantification and association with response to immune checkpoint blockade in non-small-cell lung cancer. JCO Precis Oncol. 2019; 3:PO.19.00171. PMC6907021 31832578
  20. [28]Garassino MC, Gadgeel S, Novello S, Associations of tissue tumor mutational burden and mutational status with clinical outcomes with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for metastatic NSCLC. JTO Clin Res Rep. 2022; 4: 100431. 36793385 PMC9923193
  21. [29]West HJ, McCleland M, Cappuzzo F, Original research: clinical efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy in KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer with STK11, KEAP1, or TP53 commutations: subgroup results from the phase III IMpower150 trial. J Immunother Cancer. 2022; 10: e003027. 35190375 PMC8862451
  22. [30]Song S, Nguyen V, Schrank T, Loss of SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling alters NRF2 signaling in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Mol Cancer Res. 2020; 18: 1777– 1788. 32855269 PMC7718321
  23. [31]Best SA, Sutherland KD. “Keaping” a lid on lung cancer: the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway. Cell Cycle. 2018; 17: 1696– 1707. 30009666 PMC6133308
  24. [32]Tian Y, Wu K, Liu Q, Modification of platinum sensitivity by KEAP1/NRF2 signals in non-small cell lung cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2016; 9: 1– 14. 27601007 PMC5012055
  25. [33]Samstein RM, Lee CH, Shoushtari AN, Tumor mutational load predicts survival after immunotherapy across multiple cancer types. Nat Genet. 2019; 51: 202– 206. 30643254 PMC6365097
  26. [34]Valero C, Lee M, Hoen D, The association between tumor mutational burden and prognosis is dependent on treatment context. Nat Genet. 2021; 53: 11– 15. 33398197 PMC7796993
  27. [35]Paz-Ares L, Langer CJ, Novello S, Pembrolizumab (pembro) plus platinum-based chemotherapy (chemo) for metastatic NSCLC: Tissue TMB (tTMB) and outcomes in KEYNOTE-021. Ann Oncol. 2019; 30: v917– v918.
  28. [36]Cristescu R, Aurora-Garg D, Albright A, Tumor mutational burden predicts the efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy: a pan-tumor retrospective analysis of participants with advanced solid tumors. J Immunother Cancer. 2022; 10: e003091. 35101941 PMC8804694
  29. [37]Merino DM, McShane LM, Fabrizio D, Establishing guidelines to harmonize tumor mutational burden (TMB): in silico assessment of variation in TMB quantification across diagnostic platforms: phase I of the Friends of Cancer Research TMB Harmonization Project. J Immunother Cancer. 2020; 8: e000147. 32217756 PMC7174078
  30. [38]Ayers M, Lunceford J, Nebozhyn M, IFN-γ-related mRNA profile predicts clinical response to PD-1 blockade. J Clin Invest. 2017; 127: 2930– 2940. 28650338 PMC5531419
  31. [39]Stenzinger A, Allen JD, Maas J, Tumor mutational burden standardization initiatives: recommendations for consistent tumor mutational burden assessment in clinical samples to guide immunotherapy treatment decisions. Genes. Chromosomes Cancer. 2019; 58: 578– 588. 30664300 PMC6618007

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alessi, J. V., Elkrief, A., Ricciuti, B., Wang, X., Cortellini, A., Vaz, V. R., Lamberti, G., Frias, R. L., Venkatraman, D., Fulgenzi, C. A. M., Pecci, F., Recondo, G., Di Federico, A., Barrichello, A., Park, H., Nishino, M., Hambelton, G. M., Egger, J. V., Ladanyi, M., Digumarthy, S., Johnson, B. E., Christiani, D. C., Lin, X., Gainor, J. F., Lin, J. J., Pinato, D. J., Schoenfeld, A. J., & Awad, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Awad, Mark M.
Venue
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-06
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
731-743
ISSN
1556-0864 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319939127
Cited by
97
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 13
FWCI
11.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Thoracic Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Falk Foundation
  • Amgen
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca (U01CA209414, R01CA203636)
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Wellcome Trust (PS3416)
  • ViiV Healthcare
  • Jazz Pharmaceuticals
  • Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
  • Boston Pharmaceuticals
  • Northwell Health
  • Relay Therapeutics
  • Moderna
  • G1 Therapeutics
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Imperial College London
  • Bayer HealthCare
  • Eisai
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (25697)
  • Genentech
  • Imperial Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U01HG009088, U01HG012064)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA203636, U19CA203654, CA209414, P30CA008748, U01CA209414, R35CA197449)
  • Daiichi Sankyo Europe
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
advanced non-small cell lung cancer, chemoimmunotherapy, first-line therapy, PD-L1 expression, tumor proportion score, tumor mutational burden, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, performance status, STK11 mutation, KEAP1 mutation, SMARCA4 mutation, KRAS mutation, KRAS wild-type, prognostic factors, platinum-based chemotherapy
MeSH terms
Kelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, DNA Helicases, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Mutation, Nuclear Proteins, Retrospective Studies, Transcription Factors, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Genomics, NF-E2-Related Factor 2, B7-H1 Antigen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review