Recent developments in metal nanoparticles functionalized nanocomposite adsorbents for heavy metals removal from wastewaters
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fe3O4@SiO2@carboxyl-PAMAM nanocomposites exhibited adsorption capacities of 117.0, 119.16, and 115.82 mg g−1 for Pb(ii), Cu(ii), and Cd(ii), respectively, achieving removal efficiencies above 96%.
“In a separate investigation, Fe3O4@SiO2@carboxyl-PAMAM nanocomposites exhibited adsorption capacities of 117.0, 119.16, and 115.82 mg g−1 for Pb(ii), Cu(ii), and Cd(ii), respectively, achieving removal efficiencies above 96%.222”
From Emerging nanotechnology approaches for sustainable water treatment and heavy metals removal: a comprehensive review (2025) · cites this paper as [222]
Iron-based nanoparticles demonstrate superiority in redox-mediated detoxification and magnetic recoverability, whereas Ag NPs provide combination antibacterial and adsorption properties.
“Iron-based nanoparticles demonstrate superiority in redox-mediated detoxification and magnetic recoverability, whereas Ag NPs provide combination antibacterial and adsorption properties.”
From Emerging nanotechnology approaches for sustainable water treatment and heavy metals removal: a comprehensive review (2025) · cites this paper as [222]
Metal-based nanoparticles, specifically iron and silver nanostructures, exhibit elevated adsorption capabilities, adjustable reactivity, and multifunctionality for eliminating heavy metals and related contaminants from water and wastewater.
“In conclusion, metal-based nanoparticles, specifically iron and silver nanostructures, exhibit elevated adsorption capabilities, adjustable reactivity, and multifunctionality for eliminating of heavy metals and related contaminants from water and wastewater.”
From Emerging nanotechnology approaches for sustainable water treatment and heavy metals removal: a comprehensive review (2025) · cites this paper as [222]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 143 · Cited by 69
- Authors
- Natarajan, B., Kannan, P., Rather, J. A., & Sheikh, R. A.
- Affiliations
- Jiaxing University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Kannan, Palanisamy
- Rather, Jahangir Ahmad
- Venue
- Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-06
- Volume
- 147
- Pages
- 104942
- ISSN
- 1876-1070 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4379115043
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 143
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 7
- FWCI
- 5.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Jiaxing University (CD70518066)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
- Keywords
- metal nanoparticles, nanocomposite adsorbent, heavy metal removal, wastewater treatment, carbon nanotubes, graphene oxide, graphene quantum dots, zeolites, metal-organic frameworks, nanoparticle functionalization, adsorption, water quality monitoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
